View Full Version : New Behringer A500 amp 2 ohm stable?
christianb
09-29-2005, 12:49 AM
Usually a "pro" amp will be stable down to 2 ohms, stereo. I can't find any information on these amps as to whether or not they can take a 2 ohm load.
Anyone care to take a guess or has experience with one of these?
Thanks!
<A HREF="http://www.partsexpress.com/pe/pshowdetl.cfm?&DID=7&Partnumber=248-749&raid=25&rak=248-749">http://www.partsexpress.com/pe/pshowdetl.cfm?&DID=7&Partnumber=248-749&raid=25&rak=248-749</A>
shawn_a
09-29-2005, 01:30 AM
Quoting the product manual "Keep in mind the minimum power impedance of 4 Ohms per channel in stereo mode. When in mono-bridged mode, a loudspeaker whose impedance is at least 8 Ohms must be used."
Kind of a bummer but I half expected it. I'm gonna stick with my Crown XLS amps and be happy I think.
shawn
Paul O
09-29-2005, 09:30 AM
I don't want to get on a big rant here, but neither the Behringer copy or the Alesis it was copied from can be considered true Pro amplifiers. At best they are dirt cheap pro-style wanabees. This is absolutely the low end of the market down there with Pyle and Samson, targeted at the solo musician running a home studio type setup. There's a long long way to go between these pieces and a Crown MA series, or QSC PL.
kduggan
09-29-2005, 01:44 PM
> I agree these won't hold a candle to a Crown, the price tag still makes then a good option for fan free home use. I don't think even Behringer thinks anyone is going to trash an R-1 and slap these in the rack.
I don't want to get on a big rant here, but
> neither the Behringer copy or the Alesis it
> was copied from can be considered true Pro
> amplifiers. At best they are dirt cheap
> pro-style wanabees. This is absolutely the
> low end of the market down there with Pyle
> and Samson, targeted at the solo musician
> running a home studio type setup. There's a
> long long way to go between these pieces and
> a Crown MA series, or QSC PL.
thylantyr
09-29-2005, 03:48 PM
>>Samson,
I've seen some Samson internal pics and it looked
like it was better engineered than Crown XLS
from a 'robust' point of view.
/hehe
I seen A500 internal pics, it looks like a
DIY amp project you see on the forums, very
bare bones.
Bare bones doesn't mean bad, but I would bet
it's not over engineered and the specs are
too optimistic.
It comes down to what your expectations are.
$179 for A500 is not bad, but it's not a monster
pro amp. /hehe
justinc
09-30-2005, 09:33 AM
can you post the internal pics of this amp. I was considering 2 of these to do a set of active line arrays however the couple reviews there have been for them dont seem very good.
> I've seen some Samson internal pics and it
> looked
> like it was better engineered than Crown XLS
> from a 'robust' point of view.
> /hehe
> I seen A500 internal pics, it looks like a
> DIY amp project you see on the forums, very
> bare bones.
> Bare bones doesn't mean bad, but I would bet
> it's not over engineered and the specs are
> too optimistic.
> It comes down to what your expectations are.
> $179 for A500 is not bad, but it's not a
> monster
> pro amp. /hehe
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.