No announcement yet.

Does the high end frequency need to be addressed?

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Does the high end frequency need to be addressed?

    Was looking at the spec sheet on this tweeter that was just announced:*
    It is my understanding that the human ear can typically only go up to 20k hertz.* However, the spec sheet shows some "funky" things going on maybe starting around 30K.* Would one even need to address that?*

  • #2
    If you wanted to address the issue at least the parts to do it would be very small.* If there's some harmonic content making it to the tweeter then a tank circuit would help mitigate any potential down range problems.
    R = h/(2*pi*m*c) and don't you forget it! || Periodic Table as redrawn by Marshall Freerks and Ignatius Schumacher || King Crimson Radio

    Byzantium Project & Build Thread || MiniByzy Build Thread || 3 x Peerless 850439 HDS 3-way || 8" 2-way - RS28A/B&C8BG51

    95% of Climate Models Agree: The Observations Must be Wrong
    "Gravitational systems are the ashes of prior electrical systems.". - Hannes Alfven, Nobel Laureate, Plasma physicist.


    • #3
      That's typical of hard dome tweeters IMO. The breakup nodes are pushed into supersonic range, and show up on extended graphs like that. There are only a couple things I can think of that could excite that, and whether or not your ears will notice is debatable:
      • You routinely listen to HD audio at high sample rates (88k or 96k sample rate sources), and that source actually has content up there
      • You clip or otherwise distort your source system so harmonics start showing up into supersonic range, which are then boosted by that tweeter
      Generally, I wouldn't worry about that so much. That tweeter looks great to me (pending the obvious I haven't heard it yet caveat)
      Electronics engineer, woofer enthusiast, and musician.
      Wogg Music