Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Port vs passive radiator

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Scarface1
    replied
    Originally posted by Chris Roemer View Post
    Yes - if you can hit the same tuning.
    "Valley" in driver response and excursion and impedance.
    Peak in port output (or PR output and excursion).

    That LOOKS like an excursion plot - even though it says "phase"?
    Thanks Chris, my bad edited wrong. Phase is the next one. Has to be excursion

    Leave a comment:


  • Chris Roemer
    replied
    Yes - if you can hit the same tuning.
    "Valley" in driver response and excursion and impedance.
    Peak in port output (or PR output and excursion).

    That LOOKS like an excursion plot - even though it says "phase"?

    Leave a comment:


  • Scarface1
    started a topic Port vs passive radiator

    Port vs passive radiator

    Hi everyone, I have built a Voxel sub (kind off) and now I wanna built something portable with the same driver. I want to use a passive radiator because the port is to long. If I give it a lot of power it will exceed xmax at 50 hz ( with port), but thanks to the port tuning I will have extension to 30 hz.

    Now the question, if you tune the box with passive radiators do you have the same dip around tuning frequency.
Working...
X