Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Flex Your PCD Mettle:

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • bruson
    replied
    Re: EconoWave Deluxe:

    In my Xover I've gone back to a Gedlee style.
    I looked at a few photos of Nathan and Abbey xovers on various sites of various ages, 2008-2010.
    I measured all the inductors and caps physical sizes using Madisound and stuff I have on hand and came up with a educated guess for values. Photoshop was a big help. So were Gedlee posts in DIY and his diy builders. I'm sure they are not exactly what he uses now, especially as he has improved them in late 2010.
    Listening tests tell me my versions of Gedlee xovers improve it more than my version of a Zilch filter.
    On a simple FR they no real difference from Zilch-type xover. None. Just like using teflon caps and Mills resistors showed no FR difference.
    But everything sounded cleaner and clearer. My girlfriend and my son even noticed. But the FR didn't. It's not worth posting the charts.
    Now I know why guys who live and die by measurements laugh at my audio hallucinations, er, subjective listening decisions. I couldn't measure any difference, but it sounded so much better. Gedlee is on to something that hasn't been discussed on this thread.

    I had some air core inductors from Madisound. The white plastic type everyone uses.
    After I thought my xover sounded great from guessing Gedlee parameters I bought some Jensen Air cores from PE.


    Cleaner and clearer sound. The spacing and layout of inductors didn't change that much.
    Next I strung them up over the MDF for fun and to use up crap I had laying around.
    You guessed it, cleaner and clearer sound.

    Mutual inductance aint the answer, unless inductors in a notch filter being 3-5 inches from each other makes a difference.

    I'm not gonna bother to measure it.
    Why would magnetics, inductors, be so affected by being lifted off MDF? Dielectric constant?
    I think there is an E-field around inductors besides a magnetic field, or does MDF affect magnetics too?

    Why can't I measure these differences?

    Leave a comment:


  • Zvuchniak
    replied
    Re: Flex Your PCD Mettle:

    Originally posted by bruson View Post
    Waveguides from Poland:
    http://www.diysoundgroup.com/WaveGuides.htm

    They are doing a group buy at DIY audio.

    I used to be like you too, about crossovers. To me simpler the better.

    Now my xover has 17 parts (I think). My best sounding speaker ever.

    With 3 notch filters.

    Done right it's great sounding.

    Done wrong it's sounds like crap.
    Thanks for the tip ;)

    Leave a comment:


  • bruson
    replied
    Re: Flex Your PCD Mettle:

    Originally posted by Zvuchniak View Post
    First i want to thank you for your patience. I'm still learning on how to use PCD and how to make xovers.

    It is not the price of components that i was worried about (they are fairly cheap). I've seen quite a bit of speakers that had few kilos of xovers but sounded bad.

    Few bad experiences led me to believe that any speaker that has too much components on the xover will sound bad.

    I trust you on this one and i agree with you in almost everything you've wrote in this post. I am aware of QSC supremacy over this WG but i could not find it anywhere in Serbia. I was looking for JBL PT-F95 or QSC-HPR152i but zilch

    There are no other WG's here except this type so i used what i had.

    Thanks again Pete. I will use xover you suggested to me and then post some pictures and listening impressions. If nothing else, i hope that i influenced some of the guys, that are lurking, to activate little with their own ideas :D

    Regards, Zvuchniak ...

    Waveguides from Poland:
    http://www.diysoundgroup.com/WaveGuides.htm

    They are doing a group buy at DIY audio.

    I used to be like you too, about crossovers. To me simpler the better.

    Now my xover has 17 parts (I think). My best sounding speaker ever.

    With 3 notch filters.

    Done right it's great sounding.

    Done wrong it's sounds like crap.

    Leave a comment:


  • muzikal-jrne
    replied
    Re: Porting of the knock down cab

    Originally posted by srbliss View Post
    Can someone tell me what the porting is for these cabs - I am going to build a 'to Zilch' build of the 'high power pro' e-waves that will sit on a pair of B380 clones. I have spent many hours searching but can't seem to find the porting info on these.
    Thanks
    Steve
    The woofers should arrive Thursday.
    I use WinISD to model enclosures below 200 Hz.

    http://www.linearteam.dk/default.aspx?pageid=winisdpro

    http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=883104

    It has really good help files. Make sure to follow the specific order they recommend for inputting the driver parameters, it matters.


    Cheers, Joe

    Leave a comment:


  • donprice
    replied
    Re: Flex Your PCD Mettle:

    To the best of my knowledge, the trap cabs Zilch used for testing were not tuned or optimized for any particular woofer (except for maybe the first one in the box). I would keep the same baffle (dimensions, c-c distance, horizontal offsets) but look at optimizing volume and tuning for your application.

    Leave a comment:


  • srbliss
    replied
    Porting of the knock down cab

    Can someone tell me what the porting is for these cabs - I am going to build a 'to Zilch' build of the 'high power pro' e-waves that will sit on a pair of B380 clones. I have spent many hours searching but can't seem to find the porting info on these.
    Thanks
    Steve
    The woofers should arrive Thursday.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pete Schumacher
    replied
    Re: Flex Your PCD Mettle:

    Originally posted by Zvuchniak View Post
    First i want to thank you for your patience. I'm still learning on how to use PCD and how to make xovers.

    It is not the price of components that i was worried about (they are fairly cheap). I've seen quite a bit of speakers that had few kilos of xovers but sounded bad.

    Few bad experiences led me to believe that any speaker that has too much components on the xover will sound bad.

    I trust you on this one and i agree with you in almost everything you've wrote in this post. I am aware of QSC supremacy over this WG but i could not find it anywhere in Serbia. I was looking for JBL PT-F95 or QSC-HPR152i but zilch

    There are no other WG's here except this type so i used what i had.

    Thanks again Pete. I will use xover you suggested to me and then post some pictures and listening impressions. If nothing else, i hope that i influenced some of the guys, that are lurking, to activate little with their own ideas :D

    Regards, Zvuchniak ...
    Well, you could go with a much simplified XO, and then smooth the result with active EQ.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zvuchniak
    replied
    Re: Flex Your PCD Mettle:

    Those notch filters are cheap. And they do the job of forcing the correct response from the tweeter to get LR4 acoustic.

    With only two components, the woofer is following an almost ideal LR4 slope. The tweeter/waveguide combo has some serious issues with getting that shape down to a lower frequency with a simple XO. That's why I posted the first one crossing at 2KHz.

    You also mentioned problems at 2KHz. You cannot fix it in the woofer, because the problem lies in the tweeter. Without some serious EQ, there's real linearity problems with that waveguide. When you compare it to the QSC 152i waveguide, the differences are quite apparent. Without the EQ at 2KHz on the tweeter, you'll either have the peak at 2K, or the broad dip just before it. There's also the problem with the broad bump centered around 8KHz, and EQ is the only solution for that as well.

    Personally, that WG would seem to better match a smaller format woofer instead of having to be forced to go lower in frequency to match a 12".

    Is 11 components really all that much for a 2-way that keeps response to +-2dB?
    First i want to thank you for your patience. I'm still learning on how to use PCD and how to make xovers.

    It is not the price of components that i was worried about (they are fairly cheap). I've seen quite a bit of speakers that had few kilos of xovers but sounded bad.

    Few bad experiences led me to believe that any speaker that has too much components on the xover will sound bad.

    I trust you on this one and i agree with you in almost everything you've wrote in this post. I am aware of QSC supremacy over this WG but i could not find it anywhere in Serbia. I was looking for JBL PT-F95 or QSC-HPR152i but zilch

    There are no other WG's here except this type so i used what i had.

    Thanks again Pete. I will use xover you suggested to me and then post some pictures and listening impressions. If nothing else, i hope that i influenced some of the guys, that are lurking, to activate little with their own ideas :D

    Regards, Zvuchniak ...

    Leave a comment:


  • dantheman
    replied
    Re: Flex Your PCD Mettle:

    That's sweet Pete! Thank you for your contributions. Top notch work again.

    Dan

    Leave a comment:


  • Pete Schumacher
    replied
    Re: Flex Your PCD Mettle:

    Played with it some more. 12 components. Now, the response stays within +- 1.5dB. And look at the reverse null. 1393Hz ;)





    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Pete Schumacher
    replied
    Re: Flex Your PCD Mettle:

    Originally posted by Zvuchniak View Post
    I will rather go with few dB less than 2 notch filters :D Like Z-man used to say, everyone has their own way of dealing with issues.

    Thanks for suggestions. I'll try the 12dB/o and 18 dB/o for midbass and i'll post some listening impressions after.

    If anyone has anything to say, feel free to comment. That's why the pictures i posted are here for

    Regards, Z ...
    Those notch filters are cheap. And they do the job of forcing the correct response from the tweeter to get LR4 acoustic.

    With only two components, the woofer is following an almost ideal LR4 slope. The tweeter/waveguide combo has some serious issues with getting that shape down to a lower frequency with a simple XO. That's why I posted the first one crossing at 2KHz.

    You also mentioned problems at 2KHz. You cannot fix it in the woofer, because the problem lies in the tweeter. Without some serious EQ, there's real linearity problems with that waveguide. When you compare it to the QSC 152i waveguide, the differences are quite apparent. Without the EQ at 2KHz on the tweeter, you'll either have the peak at 2K, or the broad dip just before it. There's also the problem with the broad bump centered around 8KHz, and EQ is the only solution for that as well.

    Personally, that WG would seem to better match a smaller format woofer instead of having to be forced to go lower in frequency to match a 12".

    Is 11 components really all that much for a 2-way that keeps response to +-2dB?

    Leave a comment:


  • Zvuchniak
    replied
    Re: Flex Your PCD Mettle:

    I will rather go with few dB less than 2 notch filters :D Like Z-man used to say, everyone has their own way of dealing with issues.

    Thanks for suggestions. I'll try the 12dB/o and 18 dB/o for midbass and i'll post some listening impressions after.

    If anyone has anything to say, feel free to comment. That's why the pictures i posted are here for

    Regards, Z ...
    Last edited by Zvuchniak; 02-21-2011, 10:47 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pete Schumacher
    replied
    Re: Flex Your PCD Mettle:

    Originally posted by Zvuchniak View Post
    That is 2KHz xover frequency... I thought that whole point of Econowave is to, in some way, replicate the JBL 4425 but with constant directivity.

    Every one of the JBL top line speakers had xover frequency between 700 and 1500 Hz. I think that 2000Hz is way high for 12" midbass and for what Zilch was trying to do...

    I do not have measuring equipment yet so i will have to wait to finish the speakers and then invite someone to do the measuring and tweaking of the crossover. I will post my results here...

    Regards...
    OK, even more EQ.
    I like the way this looks!!! :D

    1500Hz LR4

    Woofer:

    2.2mH, 22uF

    Tweeter: pos polarity

    10uF in series with 4 Ohm, .2mH shunt.

    parallel RLC BEFORE the crossover:
    .55mH, 12uF, 8 Ohm

    parallel RLC AFTER the crossover:
    .4mH, 1.5uF, 25 Ohm





    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Zvuchniak
    replied
    Re: Flex Your PCD Mettle:

    OK, I ran a sim with no acoustic offset, with the mic position midway between woofer and tweeter, and a baseline sensitivity of 92dB.

    Woofer XO:
    2mH, 15uF

    Tweeter XO: (pos polarity)
    4.7uF, .2mH (.2Ohm 20ga)

    L-pad:
    3.3 series, 6.8 shunt.

    Waveguide EQ:
    series connected .05mH, 10uF, 2 Ohm. Placed in parallel with the 6.8 Ohm resistor and tweeter terminals.
    That is 2KHz xover frequency... I thought that whole point of Econowave is to, in some way, replicate the JBL 4425 but with constant directivity.

    Every one of the JBL top line speakers had xover frequency between 700 and 1500 Hz. I think that 2000Hz is way high for 12" midbass and for what Zilch was trying to do...

    I do not have measuring equipment yet so i will have to wait to finish the speakers and then invite someone to do the measuring and tweaking of the crossover. I will post my results here...

    Regards...

    Leave a comment:


  • Zvuchniak
    replied
    Re: Flex Your PCD Mettle:

    I will make some pictures of baffle and upload them in few minutes...

    EDIT: Here it is



    http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/4543/img0103qy.jpg

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X