Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Speaker porn

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Speaker porn

    It's not orange though. It's copper. Exactly like the Excels. No one seems to think they are homely.

    Gee guys, it's what's inside that counts. Stop being so shallow. Sheez! :p
    audioheuristics isn't around right now...

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Speaker porn

      Originally posted by markk View Post
      It's not orange though. It's copper. Exactly like the Excels. No one seems to think they are homely.

      Gee guys, it's what's inside that counts. Stop being so shallow. Sheez! :p
      What's the contour network look like!!!!
      R = h/(2*pi*m*c) and don't you forget it! || Periodic Table as redrawn by Marshall Freerks and Ignatius Schumacher || King Crimson Radio

      Byzantium Project & Build Thread || MiniByzy Build Thread || 3 x Peerless 850439 HDS 3-way || 8" 2-way - RS28A/B&C8BG51


      95% of Climate Models Agree: The Observations Must be Wrong

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Speaker porn

        Originally posted by Pete Schumacher View Post
        What's the contour network look like!!!!
        You mean how'd I get it to look like this (er, simulated...)-oh my usual 75th order LR eclectic quasi transient perfect 45 component cryogenically dehumidified job...

        Gotta love that auto squintifying PE thumbnail thing...
        Attached Files
        audioheuristics isn't around right now...

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: Speaker porn

          PS-that dip at 23k is a real downer...:eek:
          audioheuristics isn't around right now...

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: Speaker porn

            here, fixed the dip at 23k:D
            Attached Files
            audioheuristics isn't around right now...

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: Speaker porn

              Originally posted by markk View Post
              It's not orange though. It's copper. Exactly like the Excels. No one seems to think they are homely.
              I think the Excels (with copper) are homely. I like the black phase plugs on Seas woofers, not the ugly copper ones. Copper should be hidden on the inside of the motor structure.

              Whats even worse than ugly copper is FAKE copper, those aren't fake copper, are they?

              I also think the choice of copper for the phase plugs on the new Dayton full range woofers is really ugly. Did copper win the poll? I thought we voted against copper? (Remember they took a poll about a year ago?)

              EDIT: well, if they sound good, I wouldn't mind. If you covered the cabinets in copper sheet, maybe I would like that. I guess they look kind of cool anyway.
              "...this is not a subwoofer" - Jeff Bagby ;)

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: Speaker porn

                Originally posted by critofur View Post
                I think the Excels (with copper) are homely. I like the black phase plugs on Seas woofers, not the ugly copper ones. Copper should be hidden on the inside of the motor structure.

                Whats even worse than ugly copper is FAKE copper, those aren't fake copper, are they?

                I also think the choice of copper for the phase plugs on the new Dayton full range woofers is really ugly. Did copper win the poll? I thought we voted against copper? (Remember they took a poll about a year ago?)

                EDIT: well, if they sound good, I wouldn't mind. If you covered the cabinets in copper sheet, maybe I would like that. I guess they look kind of cool anyway.
                That's what I was talking about, the new daytons and tang bands look bad. I think the best looking copper phase plug was on the CSS full ranges. Although I thought the daytons were fake copper like the tb. I do like the copper seas phase plugs though.

                Dan

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: Speaker porn

                  fyi

                  I've got a set of measured curves in box for the W3-1878 driver with a simple parallel LCR and also an added LR shelf at my blog for those who are curious. Because of the raw in box response, a simple trap works well for both baffle step and FR contouring.

                  I'll try to send Zaph the drivers somewhere in the near future so he can test them as well.

                  http://www.audioheuristics.org/markk_wp/
                  audioheuristics isn't around right now...

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: Speaker porn

                    Hmmm, interesting little project there, Mark. It's topical for me, because my wife recently pointed out to me that we don't have any computer speakers (I usually wear headphones). I happen to have a 12" driver in a 1 cuft box under the desk that is begging for a LT circuit. This could anchor the low end nicely, but it needs some small speakers that would fit on either side of the monitor to make it come together. Looks like the TB 3" can be crossed over around 150-200Hz. How would you feel about its low frequency performance, if used at 2 feet listening distance, wall mounted?

                    I think that you mixed up your text regarding the rising response above 10k:
                    The 15 degree off axis curve for the unit without the shelf looks just like the red curve, so toe the speakers if you think you hear the rise.
                    Did you perhaps mean that, if you think you can/will hear the rising response and won't like it, you should NOT toe in the speakers. That way you would be listening to the speaker off axis, where the response is drooping compared to on axis, and the response at the listening position will be flattened out.

                    Keep us posted on this!

                    -Charlie
                    Charlie's Audio Pages: http://audio.claub.net

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: Speaker porn

                      Here is a nice alternative to the Topping TP30 amp that I plan to use:



                      It's a dual 25W amp that uses a Sanyo STK chip sold by ApexJr. I already have a pair of these in my attic that I intend to use in a budget active speaker project. I have tested it out and can say that the amp is not bad. I was able to find the data sheet for the STK 4141V IC, and it has pretty good distortion (0.08%) and about 2dB of headroom using the transformer that Apex sells along with the amp. IIRC the DC rails are in the low 30V range, and according to the spec sheet the STK IC can produce about 45W in to 8 ohms.

                      It's possible to disassemble the unit--removing the ugly plate and an internal circuit board with some extra stuff on it leaves the heat sink and the amp board. This would make for a cleaner looking install. The amp board has on board +/-12VDC, so it would be easy to connect some line level circuitry for a 150 Hz HP crossover (e.g. for integration with my subwoofer). The input sensitivity is only 100mV or so, so you need to take care about the input level.

                      -Charlie
                      Charlie's Audio Pages: http://audio.claub.net

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X