$vboptions[bbtitle]   $vboptions[bbtitle]  
  Terms and Conditions     Project Showcase
  Resource Index   Speaker Terms Glossary
  Security/Privacy   Speaker Replacement Help
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1

    Default Calculating Port Length for Dual Woofers


    How can port length, for a bass reflex enclosure, be calculated when using two woofers within a single enclosure?

  2. #2

    Default Recalculate everything.


    > How can port length, for a bass reflex
    > enclosure, be calculated when using two
    > woofers within a single enclosure?

    The same way you calculated it in the first place, but this time for Vas, use twice the Vas of one driver.

    Not sure if you mean you are trying to keep the same box that was appropriate for one driver, and now use that volume for two drivers. If so, then you aren't going to get the same low F extension. Fb will be higher. Basically, the tube should probably be shorter. Recalculate and remodel everything.



  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Appleton
    Posts
    5,869

    Default Re: Recalculate everything.


    > The same way you calculated it in the first
    > place, but this time for Vas, use twice the
    > Vas of one driver.

    > Not sure if you mean you are trying to keep
    > the same box that was appropriate for one
    > driver, and now use that volume for two
    > drivers. If so, then you aren't going to get
    > the same low F extension. Fb will be higher.
    > Basically, the tube should probably be
    > shorter. Recalculate and remodel everything.

    As a wise man once said, build the box twice the size (as for a single woofer) and use TWO of the originally recommended ports.

  4. #4

    Default How wise was that man?


    > As a wise man once said, build the box twice
    > the size (as for a single woofer) and use
    > TWO of the originally recommended ports.

    That doesn't work for me. The ports are too short. It's not too far off though. Could be I'm not calculating right.

    Anyway, for two woofers, to get the same F3, the box SHOULD be twice as big for sure, and you should use a wider port. If John wants to give the spec.s, we can work something out.


  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Kokomo, Indiana
    Posts
    7,246

    Default Re: How wise was that man?


    > That doesn't work for me. The ports are too
    > short. It's not too far off though. Could be
    > I'm not calculating right.

    > Anyway, for two woofers, to get the same F3,
    > the box SHOULD be twice as big for sure, and
    > you should use a wider port. If John wants
    > to give the spec.s, we can work something
    > out.

    Well, that instruction should work correctly. Keep in mind though, that the port tunes the box independently of the drivers used so if someone wants 3 cubic feet tuned to 30Hz the port is the same no matter what woofer(s) are used.

  6. #6

    Default Should work...


    ..since if you use two separate volumes, the total volume is twice what is was for one woofer, and you have two ports the saem size. What difference can it make to simply remove the barrier..? But the conventional port calculation says it does not work.

    The reason is that root 2 (the increase in effective radius of two ports) squared divided by 2 (twice the Volume)is indeed one, so that left side fraction part of the equation equals out (the part with the Fb and Vb in it), but then you have the negative (1.463 times R). And that is variable. The bigger the radius you are dealing with, the more that estimate veers from true.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Kokomo, Indiana
    Posts
    7,246

    Default Re: Should work...


    > ..since if you use two separate volumes, the
    > total volume is twice what is was for one
    > woofer, and you have two ports the saem
    > size. What difference can it make to simply
    > remove the barrier..? But the conventional
    > port calculation says it does not work.

    > The reason is that root 2 (the increase in
    > effective radius of two ports) squared
    > divided by 2 (twice the Volume)is indeed
    > one, so that left side fraction part of the
    > equation equals out (the part with the Fb
    > and Vb in it), but then you have the
    > negative (1.463 times R). And that is
    > variable. The bigger the radius you are
    > dealing with, the more that estimate veers
    > from true.

    Well, theory and math both say it will work fine. Using the same program, that uses the standard port formula (I know because I wrote the program, so I know what formula was used) I figured the following: Using a 50 liter box, 1 3" diameter port, and an Fb of 30Hz it calculates a length of 9.74 in. Uisng a 100 liter box, 2 3" ports, and an Fb of 30 Hz it calculates a length of 9.74 in. This looks pretty close to me.

    The end correction that you say is off, is adjusted by the added cross-sectional area to result in the same length in the end.


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Your #1 Source for Audio, Video & Speaker Building Components


Clearance Center
Deal of the Day
New Products




View Our latest
Sales Flyer

Prices Effective
Through 6/30/13


Order our FREE 336 Page Full Color Catalog



Speaker Component Categories

Home Audio Speakers

Professional Audio & Guitar Speakers

Car Audio Speakers

Speaker Buyouts

Measurement & Design Tools

Subwoofer Plate Amplifiers

Full-Range Plate Amplifiers

Crossover Components

Cabinet Hardware & Speaker
Grill Cloth

Speaker Cabinets

Subwoofer System Kits

Speaker Kits

Speaker Repair Parts

Speaker Wire