$vboptions[bbtitle]   $vboptions[bbtitle]  
  Terms and Conditions     Project Showcase
  Resource Index   Speaker Terms Glossary
  Security/Privacy   Speaker Replacement Help
Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    N. California
    Posts
    485

    Default Q on ZaphAudio measurement conditions

    Hi,

    Does anyone know the mic distance used for the frequency response measurements at ZaphAudio? The distance appears to be specified for harmonic distortion of the various drivers, but not for frequency response.

    Thanks - much appreciated.

    Rob

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    425

    Default Re: Q on ZaphAudio measurement conditions

    why not just ask him?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Oakland, Calif.
    Posts
    962
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default Re: Q on ZaphAudio measurement conditions

    Quote Originally Posted by xavier View Post
    why not just ask him?
    That can be problematic

    http://www.zaphaudio.com/email.html

    Plus he has been particularly busy with work recently.


    Here is his description of general testing:

    http://www.zaphaudio.com/setup.html

    The "Infinite Baffle" section gives a brief description of the mic distance selection.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Kansas City, Missouri
    Posts
    1,868
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Q on ZaphAudio measurement conditions

    Ive read about his measurement setup before, maybe seen pictures. IIRC its pretty big, like 4x8 or bigger. I know recently he said its big enough that he wrenched his back out and cant use/move it currently. If you search hard enough the info might be out there somewhere. If I see/recall it I'll post it.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Kansas City, Missouri
    Posts
    1,868
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Q on ZaphAudio measurement conditions

    Actually, go here.

    http://www.zaphaudio.com/setup.html

    Scroll down to measurements and infinite baffle. It IS a piece of 4x8, with bracing and whatnot.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    N. California
    Posts
    485

    Default Re: Q on ZaphAudio measurement conditions

    Quote Originally Posted by xavier View Post
    why not just ask him?
    Mr. Krutke discourages direct contact, in an effort to protect his time, which I can certainly respect, and occasionally admire as I have multiple time demands as well.

    If he wants to respond, he will. Otherwise, I'm hoping someone else has a recollection.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    N. California
    Posts
    485

    Default Re: Q on ZaphAudio measurement conditions

    Quote Originally Posted by evilskillit View Post
    Actually, go here.

    http://www.zaphaudio.com/setup.html

    Scroll down to measurements and infinite baffle. It IS a piece of 4x8, with bracing and whatnot.

    Ok, there is a bit more detail here. I understand that the tweeter measurement distance is 4", presumably for both frequency response and HD.

    For the woofer, it looks like two measurements which are spliced. One is at 0.25", while the other is "it depends". Now, would the 0.25" distance be ~>600 Hz, or ~<600 Hz? The 600 Hz figure is listed on the measurement details for the 5.5" drivers.

    Regards,

    Rob

  8. #8

    Default Re: Q on ZaphAudio measurement conditions

    Quote Originally Posted by weinstro View Post
    Ok, there is a bit more detail here. I understand that the tweeter measurement distance is 4", presumably for both frequency response and HD.

    For the woofer, it looks like two measurements which are spliced. One is at 0.25", while the other is "it depends". Now, would the 0.25" distance be ~>600 Hz, or ~<600 Hz? The 600 Hz figure is listed on the measurement details for the 5.5" drivers.

    Regards,

    Rob
    Less than. Close micing is for low frequency measurements... There is some science behind that, but it is beyond me.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9jROjFPAis
    Why you should never support dog shows or breeders

    http://www.facebook.com/GcfCustomAudio

    Facebook

    My Website, a work in progress.


    "When a true genius appears in this world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him." -Jonathan Swift

    "Sure, the placebo effect is real - but there ain't no sugar pill gonna cure cancer."

    *Gort

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Kansas City, Missouri
    Posts
    1,868
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Q on ZaphAudio measurement conditions

    Well I think very close, like less than an inch or couple of inches from the dustcap is the only way to capture LF without getting room interaction since the waves are so large... ?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Brooklyn NY
    Posts
    3,069
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Re: Q on ZaphAudio measurement conditions

    Fr of the tweeter is measured on axis 1 meter at 2.83v Zaph mentions that he gets as close as 4 inches without an affect on FR.
    FR of the woofer is measured twice: near field (mice close to the dust cap for low frequency data acquisition) and far field at 1 meter for high frequency.
    I think that's what Zaph is doing.
    Is your question related to an absolute FR level?

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    N. California
    Posts
    485

    Default Re: Q on ZaphAudio measurement conditions

    Quote Originally Posted by r-carpenter View Post
    Fr of the tweeter is measured on axis 1 meter at 2.83v Zaph mentions that he gets as close as 4 inches without an affect on FR.
    FR of the woofer is measured twice: near field (mice close to the dust cap for low frequency data acquisition) and far field at 1 meter for high frequency.
    I think that's what Zaph is doing.
    Is your question related to an absolute FR level?
    Not yet. I'm attempting to use the FRD toolset (and PCD, too) to walk through the design in order to validate the steps. This is a self-learning exercise.

    The basic approach seems to be:
    • Enter measured test data
    • remove effects of test baffle
    • add effects of target baffle and enclosure
    • normalize, extract phase, model crossovers

    What I have is traced FR data, and some baffle diffraction models. But, the effect of the baffle is impacted somewhat by the measurement distance. So, some knowledge of the distance would be helpful.

    Regards,

    Rob

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Your #1 Source for Audio, Video & Speaker Building Components


Clearance Center
Deal of the Day
New Products




View Our latest
Sales Flyer

Prices Effective
Through 6/30/13


Order our FREE 336 Page Full Color Catalog



Speaker Component Categories

Home Audio Speakers

Professional Audio & Guitar Speakers

Car Audio Speakers

Speaker Buyouts

Measurement & Design Tools

Subwoofer Plate Amplifiers

Full-Range Plate Amplifiers

Crossover Components

Cabinet Hardware & Speaker
Grill Cloth

Speaker Cabinets

Subwoofer System Kits

Speaker Kits

Speaker Repair Parts

Speaker Wire