$vboptions[bbtitle]   $vboptions[bbtitle]  
  Terms and Conditions     Project Showcase
  Resource Index   Speaker Terms Glossary
  Security/Privacy   Speaker Replacement Help
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: sp10 fs.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    O'fallon MO
    Posts
    1,845

    Default sp10 fs.

    So I finally have a wt3 and have been testing it. I tested my sp10 sunfire true sub clone and fs. was at a little over 50. I knew it didn't sound like it was tuned right. I checked wt3 on some other drivers and they tested close to published specs. So here are my free air measurements. Re 3.4ohm, Fs 42.39, Qts .604, Qms 5.388, Le 3.36. I am curious if these no. are close to others measurements?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Kokomo, Indiana
    Posts
    7,234

    Default Re: sp10 fs.

    Quote Originally Posted by killa View Post
    So I finally have a wt3 and have been testing it. I tested my sp10 sunfire true sub clone and fs. was at a little over 50. I knew it didn't sound like it was tuned right. I checked wt3 on some other drivers and they tested close to published specs. So here are my free air measurements. Re 3.4ohm, Fs 42.39, Qts .604, Qms 5.388, Le 3.36. I am curious if these no. are close to others measurements?
    Those are almost exactly the parameters I measured on my Sunfire woofer. Vas is very small, which is what allows it to work so well in a very small enclosure. (By the way, I don't think the SP10 is a clone ).

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    O'fallon MO
    Posts
    1,845

    Default Re: sp10 fs.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff B. View Post
    Those are almost exactly the parameters I measured on my Sunfire woofer. Vas is very small, which is what allows it to work so well in a very small enclosure. (By the way, I don't think the SP10 is a clone ).
    I bought a passive off ebay and built my own so it is a clone Shouldn't the fs be lower with the passive though? It is a truesub replacement pr. and the box should be very close internally. I tried reverse mounting the sp10 to get more internal volume but fs didn't change much. Thanks for all the help btw. Its nice to know the wt3 came close to your measurements.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Appleton
    Posts
    5,865

    Default Re: sp10 fs.

    Quote Originally Posted by killa View Post
    I bought a passive off ebay and built my own so it is a clone Shouldn't the fs be lower with the passive though? It is a truesub replacement pr. and the box should be very close internally. I tried reverse mounting the sp10 to get more internal volume but fs didn't change much. Thanks for all the help btw. Its nice to know the wt3 came close to your measurements.

    I just happened to win a used SP10 (from miniscus) as a door prize at the recent Chicago DIY (my wife won me an emm-6 ;-) ). Not sure how many (if any) hours were put on it, but it WAS mounted. I measured it "cold" right out of a cold trunk when I got home. A few days later I tried to break in the suspension (not sure if it needed it or not). Kinda funny, but that suspension is soooooooo hard, I flipped the driver face down on a teflon cutting board and really pushed down hard to try to compress it (the weight of the 30 lb magnet alone barely budges it) ! I'm building a slot ported box for it, which I'll probably document during the Holidays.

    I'm also listing some specs from Wolf (he said someone else verified them - it MIGHT have been Jeff?), and the "specs" that I've seen.

    Yours:
    Re 3.4ohm, Fs 42.39, Qts .604, Qms 5.388, Le 3.36
    Mine - cold:
    Re 3.7ohm, Fs 42...., Qts .61, ................. Le 3.16, Vas 0.26 cf
    broken in:
    Re 3.5ohm, Fs 40...., Qts .56, ................. Le 3.19, Vas 0.27 cf
    from Wolf:
    Re 3.3ohm, Fs 40...., Qts .552, ............... Le 2.3, . Vas 0.25
    "spec"
    Re 3.4ohm, Fs 34...., Qts .57, ................. Le 1.35, Vas 0.60

    Notes:
    Re - very consistent with spec, just don't measure it cold
    Fs - VERY consistently about 41- kinda high compared to "spec"
    Qts - pretty consistent with spec
    Le - consistent between yours and mine, FAR OFF spec, Wolf's in between ?
    Vas - very consistent, but VERY FAR OFF spec

    It's POSSIBLE that after prolonged use, Fs could come down and Vas could rise, but would they ever approach "spec"? Don't know. I can certainly report back in a few years.

    What's your PR tuned to (what's its moving mass), and how big is your box?
    I'm shooting for a net Vb of 0.88 cf with an Fb near 24 Hz. Wolf was looking at using a PR, and I THINK his Vb is 1.3? cf with an Fb near 20?

    Chris

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Kokomo, Indiana
    Posts
    7,234

    Default Re: sp10 fs.

    Quote Originally Posted by killa View Post
    I bought a passive off ebay and built my own so it is a clone Shouldn't the fs be lower with the passive though? It is a truesub replacement pr. and the box should be very close internally. I tried reverse mounting the sp10 to get more internal volume but fs didn't change much. Thanks for all the help btw. Its nice to know the wt3 came close to your measurements.
    I don't understand the question. How would the passive radiator lower the driver Fs? Are you referring to the box tuning instead? In my Sunfire the passive radiator tuned the system to about 22Hz.

    A driver and system like this can be hard to measure because their suspensions are so stiff. It is possible that the WT3 is not generating enough current to activate the passive radiator and see its effect on the system impedance. I measured the passive tuning using a close-mic'ing method instead.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    17,557
    Blog Entries
    29

    Default Re: sp10 fs.

    Quote Originally Posted by Chris Roemer View Post
    Wolf was looking at using a PR, and I THINK his Vb is 1.3? cf with an Fb near 20?

    Chris


    I'm using the BASH 500W from PE, and the boost-setting is incorporated into the design. I've heard something recently that states the stock boost setting may have changed on the BASH500, so I don't know how repeatable this will be.
    There you go!
    Wolf
    "Wolf, you shall now be known as "King of the Zip ties." -Pete00t
    "Wolf and speakers equivalent to Picasso and 'Blue'" -dantheman
    "He is a true ambassador for this forum and speaker DIY in general." -Ed Froste
    "We're all in this together, so keep your stick on the ice!" - Red Green aka Steve Smith
    "We don't just make a crossover, we make a statement!" - Lawrence Fishburne for Cadillac

    *InDIYana 2013 event*

    Photobucket pages:
    http://photobucket.com/Wolf-Speakers_and_more

    My blog/writeups/thoughts here at PE:
    http://techtalk.parts-express.com/blog.php?u=4102

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    O'fallon MO
    Posts
    1,845

    Default Re: sp10 fs.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff B. View Post
    I don't understand the question. How would the passive radiator lower the driver Fs? Are you referring to the box tuning instead? In my Sunfire the passive radiator tuned the system to about 22Hz.

    A driver and system like this can be hard to measure because their suspensions are so stiff. It is possible that the WT3 is not generating enough current to activate the passive radiator and see its effect on the system impedance. I measured the passive tuning using a close-mic'ing method instead.
    Yes I meant box tuning. I was thinking that wts might not work well with the stiff suspension. i'll try close micing it.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    O'fallon MO
    Posts
    1,845

    Default Re: sp10 fs.

    Quote Originally Posted by Chris Roemer View Post

    What's your PR tuned to (what's its moving mass), and how big is your box?
    I'm shooting for a net Vb of 0.88 cf with an Fb near 24 Hz. Wolf was looking at using a PR, and I THINK his Vb is 1.3? cf with an Fb near 20?

    Chris
    Not sure how much mass is on it. It is a sunfire replacement PR so I figured if I make the box the same as the sunfire the tuning should be the same. That is why I measured it.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Your #1 Source for Audio, Video & Speaker Building Components


Clearance Center
Deal of the Day
New Products




View Our latest
Sales Flyer

Prices Effective
Through 6/30/13


Order our FREE 336 Page Full Color Catalog



Speaker Component Categories

Home Audio Speakers

Professional Audio & Guitar Speakers

Car Audio Speakers

Speaker Buyouts

Measurement & Design Tools

Subwoofer Plate Amplifiers

Full-Range Plate Amplifiers

Crossover Components

Cabinet Hardware & Speaker
Grill Cloth

Speaker Cabinets

Subwoofer System Kits

Speaker Kits

Speaker Repair Parts

Speaker Wire