Even though these speakers will be replaced, I wanted to tune the frequency response as-is, even in such a horrid listening room (my office, lol).

Testing Conditions:

Now after adding in PEQ
Testing Conditions:

Afterthoughts:
Here is before & after tuning (both plots over-layed):

Thoughts/input anyone?
Testing Conditions:
- Room size= 11' W x 11' D x 10' H. Pretty much worst possible (almost a perfect cube) situation to start out with eh? lol
- Room treatments= none
- Speaker Location= Near middle of room, toe'd in to listening position
- Smoothing= 1/6 octave
- Reflection setting (all, blended, only to)= All, since that is how it will actually sound at the listening position with all the reflections.
- Input= full-range short sine sweep
- Electronic EQ/Adjustments/tweaks=
- Subwoofer/Main Crossover Frequency= 41Hz, -48 dB/octave, Linkwitz-Riley on both the LPF of the subwoofer, and the HPF of the high output (The dbx Driverack lets you set each one completely independently of each other, thus the flexibility)
- Initial Observation= the addition of the subwoofer greatly amplified the 1st harmonic of the room mode right around 51Hz, and of course the huge room-mode peak right around ~102Hz, right around the 2nd harmonic of pretty much all 3 room axis.
Now after adding in PEQ
Testing Conditions:
- Room size= 11' W x 11' D x 10' H. Pretty much worst possible (almost a perfect cube) situation to start out with eh? lol
- Room treatments= none
- Speaker Location= Near middle of room, toe'd in to listening position
- Smoothing= 1/6 octave
- Reflection setting (all, blended, only to)= All, since that is how it will actually sound at the listening position with all the reflections.
- Input= full-range short sine sweep
- Electronic EQ/Adjustments/tweaks=
- Subwoofer/Main Crossover Frequency= 41Hz, -48 dB/octave, Linkwitz-Riley on both the LPF of the subwoofer, and the HPF of the high output (The dbx Driverack lets you set each one completely independently of each other, thus the flexibility)
- Added Parametric Equalization to both Low- and High-Outputs
- Initial Observation= NICE work Oscar ! :D
Afterthoughts:
- Flat-Response is nice, but for anyone that hasn't experimented with tuning Frequency-Response, if you aim for flat it indeed sounds "thin" on the low-end, and if you have a very reflective room, the top-end might be too bright.
- I personally liked the top-end after tuning, but I know that once I add in room-treatments, it will hopefully clear up the sound, and will drop the top-end a bit, which wouldn't be all that bad either to be honest.
- The "thin" low-end needs some "oomph" with heavy metal, so I might play with the PEQ and GEQ a bit more. When I attempt to boost up the low-end (<120Hz) I most certainly will do my best to try and not boost frequencies near the room modes (51Hz & 102Hz, for these frequencies are not only louder via the huge pile-up of room resonances, they produce time-smear that cannot be EQ'd out, since they can linger around longer than the initial excitation-sound. I'm gonna try and boost up some bass frequencies between the room resonances so only the loudness artifact is heard, and hopefully not time-smeared room resonances.
Here is before & after tuning (both plots over-layed):
Thoughts/input anyone?
Comment