The Bantams Micro Speaker System

[tomzarbo]

"The Bantams" - Small and Feisty



I would describe this system as a 'micro' speaker system without the 'micro' sound. It produces deeper bass and more detailed highs than most tiny speakers of this size are capable of. The idea for this speaker formed over time as I've begun to realize that I tend to listen more and more to smaller subwoofer/satellite systems as opposed to the larger, tower-type speakers that I've always associated with high quality sound. Although I've built many of the fantastic performing mini/small speaker designs that other folks from PE's Tech Talk board have designed, I realized that I've never designed one myself, and thought it was time to give it a shot.

Design Goals:
My goal for this design was to create an extremely small speaker with reasonable bass output, as well as a nicely executed and sparkly top end. I also wanted to use one of PE's Denovo brand pre-cut cabinets so anyone could easily build these. This design employs a Peerless 3.5" passive radiator in lieu of a traditional vent. Using the passive radiator in this system had a few positive results. First, it allowed for a reasonably low tuning with a shallow roll-off in a box size that would have been difficult with a vent. Secondly, I was able to use the frame of the PR as a crossover mount, which simplified crossover assembly and mounting in such a tiny box. Although the passive radiator is small at 3.5", it takes up almost all of the back of the enclosure, leaving room for only the smallest of binding post terminals.

Driver Selection:
Since I wanted this to be a miniature speaker, but also have a 'higher end' sound than you might normally see in the micro size, I went with the #290-224 Dayton Audio ND 91-4 woofer, and the #275-195 Dayton AMTPOD-4 tweeter pair -- which is actually designed to be used in an automotive environment. These drivers are a bit more expensive than are normally used in micro speakers, but after listening to them for some time, I have to say that I feel the extra expense was worth it.

Enclosure Design:
Using the PE supplied Denovo .04 cubic foot knock-down boxes made assembly quick, and super-simple. They only go together one way so you can't do it wrong, and the machining is so precise, the seams fit perfectly -- even when just dry fitting the panels together. If you don't have the tools to cut panels perfectly square, or just want to try an easier way to build a box for a change, these knock-down cabinets are top-notch. They even seem to use a nicer grade of MDF than what I can get locally.

A Similar Design:
First of all, let me say I realize there are similarities between Scott Sehlin's Helium speaker system and my Bantams design. The Helium design uses the ND91-4 woofer mounted in the Denovo .04 cu. ft. box just as my 'Bantams' do; and the Heliums have been around for a few years at this point. I remember reading about them when Scott first posted his design and remember being impressed with them, though I've never heard them as far as I'm aware. Fast forward a few years, and I'm looking for a small speaker project to use as my first official "Speaker Building Design Team" project which needed to use a PE box, and I wanted to think small as I've never really designed a truly tiny project. The ND65's are smaller, but I have another project slated for those, and their bass output is nowhere near the ND91's. Settling on the ND91-4 as my tiny speaker woofer, I ran some numbers on various box sizes and it seemed that the .04 cu. ft. box that PE sells could work, if I can fit my crossover in there without using up all the space... but I wouldn't have to sweat a vent eating up my interior volume because I had modeled a Peerless passive radiator and found it to be a perfect fit for both this driver as well as the box.

So, I did a search on the ND91-4 to make sure there were no similar designs on Tech Talk and ended up rediscovering the Helium speaker design. I admit, my first thought was...Nuts. I really wanted to do this design as I was becoming more intrigued with the promise of real bass output in a speaker this small, but it looked like it had already been done. Of course, I had planned on using an AMT tweeter as I loved it's presentation on Kevin Kendrik's "Archers" speakers from the 2016 MWAF.

After thinking about it a bit more, I decided to use the smaller AMT tweeter (the AMTPOD-4) and a passive radiator, and just hoped that there would be enough of a difference between the two so as to not step on any toes. Maybe I'm making too much of the similarities... some speakers lend themselves to certain size boxes, and I think that's a major factor with these. Anyway, I just wanted to relay my thought process for conjuring up with this design so you all would know where I was coming from. I don't want to take anything away from, or in any way besmirch an obviously fantastic design in the Heliums... I just think my idea -- though similar -- deserved a chance to exist in speakerdom as well.

Enclosure Assembly:
I used Titebond II wood glue and spring clamps because I had them, but you could easily use tape to hold things together until the glue dries as long as you're not using an expanding/foaming polyurethane glue. After removing the clamps I sanded the seams until they were all flush. The boxes are wisely designed with an ever-so-slight bit of extra material right where you want it, at the seams. A few passes with medium/coarse sandpaper makes the surface flush with the adjoining panel, ready for veneer or paint.
The baffles come already rounded-over on the vertical sides. A light sanding of these round-overs with medium grit sandpaper smoothes the machine marks. I also slightly softened all the remaining edges of the baffle with medium grit sandpaper as well, since I intended to paint them black. If I were veneering the baffles, I would have chose to keep the edges sharp. I also made sure to caulk the inside seams of the cabinet with silicone caulking as I went to be sure there are no air leaks.





Machining the openings in the baffles and cabinet takes time and a bit of precision.



I mounted the tweeter in a 2" hole, 1--5/8" down from the top of the baffle and centered left to right. The woofer hole is 3--1/8" and is centered 2 1/8" from the bottom of the baffle. I cut the tweeter hole with a fostner bit starting with a small 1/8" pilot hole and drilled the finished hole from both sides to eliminate tear-out. The woofer hole and terminal relief was cut with a jig saw. Be careful with this as there is not much of a flange on the woofer to cover the opening. Mark and drill small pilot holes to mount the woofer at this time. While we're on the subject of pilot holes, I used a center punch to locate every screw hole on this entire project, and I also made sure to use a drill bit that was as big as the shaft of the screw I intended to use.





The passive radiator opening is 3-3/4" and is on the rear of the cabinet, with its center at 2--15/16" down from the top and centered left to right. The PR will be in the top portion of the cabinet, which should have just the two seams for the sides visible, not the third rear seam -- leave that for the bottom where nobody will see it if the seams ever show through the veneer or paint. I cut the PR opening with a jig saw. You will notice that the jig saw may dig into the sides of the cabinet slightly, that is normal... just take it slow and try and stay on the line. Mark and drill your pilot holes to mount the PR at this time.

The holes for the binding post terminal are 5/8" from the bottom of the rear of the box and 3/4" apart. I drilled these holes with a 3/8" drill bit, using the leverage of the tip of the drill bit against the inside bottom of the enclosure to 'elongate' the hole a bit until the terminal fit in just fine with room for the quick disconnect fittings. I had to bend the terminals a bit closer to the binding post shaft to make everything fit. Mark and drill your pilot holes to mount the binding post terminal at this time. As you can see, it's a tight fit on the back of the cabinet but if you're careful, everything should fit just fine.

Continued...

[tomzarbo]

The woofer is tiny, and even in 1/2" material there is not much breathing room through the driver frame. I used a drum sander to 'open up' the areas where the driver 'breathes' leaving the drill hole 'spokes' untouched so the screws would have enough 'meat' to bite into. I did this for the passive radiator as well, although it 'breathes' a bit better with no magnet and more openings in its frame. You can also use a router to do this, but I can't always see what I'm cutting with even a small trim router and there is little room for error when working with something this small.



I chose a light colored 'figured maple' veneer for the sides, top and bottom of the enclosure to provide nice contrast with the black baffle I had planned on using. Since the back of the box is mostly passive radiator, I opted to just paint that black and make life easy. You could also paint the bottom of the box as well as opposed to veneering it, but I happened to have enough small pieces of veneer to do all four panels.




After the box is sanded smooth, tape off the areas where you don't want polyurethane, or whatever you choose as your finish, especially the front where the baffle will glue onto. I use Rustoleum's wipe-on poly because it's easy, looks good, and doesn't smell so bad that I can't apply it in my basement. 5-6 coats should get you a pretty nice finish.
The baffle was taped off and primed with BIN shellac base primer, sanded smooth with fine sandpaper, and painted with Rustoleum textured paint. I used four 2--1/2" drywall screws driven slightly into the woofer screw holes to hold up the baffle as I painted it. The texture paint needs to be applied slowly in several coats, I used 5 very light coats. If you put on too much at one time, it will drip and you will need to start over so take it slowly. The first coat hardly covers up the white primer, and by the fourth or fifth you can still see some of the light color underneath. It's a good idea to change up the direction of your spray pattern each time for a more even texture. I finished up with gloss black paint by Krylon for a nice, glossy look that will contrast nicely with the light colored cabinet. Follow the instructions on the paint you use for re-coat times.



After all finishes have had a few days to dry, it's time for some assembly. I mounted the tweeter before attaching the baffle since it is a bit tricky to mount as it's really designed for automotive stick-and-press usage. The best solution I found was to use a full wrap around the inside of the tweeter hole with the Parts Express speaker gasket foam tape, the 1/2" wide variety. You may have to clean up the tweeter hole with some sandpaper first. Don't stretch it as you apply it, but press it firmly into the baffle. If you put the baffle face down on a smooth surface, it's easier to get the foam tape flush with the baffle. Cut the gasket tape about 7" long so it overlaps, then trim both layers with a razor blade, then remove the tape under and over the cut, then press firm.



Make sure the gasket material is really stuck on there good, or it will want to 'roll' when you start to push in the tweeter.



The tweeter will push in with some resistance and may need some twisting to get it in just right. If you're careful and fiddle with it a bit, you can get it nearly flush with the baffle with just a bit of the tweeters curved flange showing. I admit, this process is a bit tricky to get right. My first try looked great, my second try was not as good and I actually ended up redoing it after the cabinet was assembled. It helps to lightly sand the gasket material to remove the 'grippy' rubber skin on the gasket so the tweeter will slide easier. You can also 'compress' the gasket for awhile before putting the tweeter in to reduce friction. Make sure the fins on the tweeter grill are horizontal when you finish. The foam gasket will have some 'bounce' to it, so I filled the gap between the tweeter and baffle with construction adhesive. This will 'firm up' the tweeter in the baffle. I shot a blob of silicone where the wire exits the tweeter as well, just in case the tweeter is not air-tight.
I glued the baffle to the box with Gorilla brand construction adhesive. I used this as opposed to glue because I allowed the black paint to 'wrap-around' the rear of the baffle ever so slightly so there would be no 'unpainted' line on that part of the speaker. The construction adhesive laid thick like caulking, but allowed for a good set up and close baffle-to-box alignment. Also, being thicker, it negated the need to seal those seams with silicone later on. Wipe any squeeze-out right away, it should come right off a polyurethaned box. Let that dry for a good 24 hours before proceeding as the adhesive is all that holds the baffle to the box.

[saabracer23]

Wow Tom, those really look great! I have a pair of the ND91s and didn't know what to do with them. Now I know, thanks!

Dan

[tomzarbo]

Crossover Design:
The crossover uses 8 components using a second order crossover for the woofer with a response-shaping resistor in series with the coil. The tweeter filter is a third-order with two resistors for shaping and level-matching. The crossover point is somewhere between 6,500 and 7,000 Hz.

Knowing that placing air core inductors next to metal such as a PR frame would likely raise their values some, I tested the specs of the inductors with the DATS while mounted on the passive radiator to see if the changes were detrimental to the design. The larger .5 mH coil for the woofer measured .52 mH by itself, and .58 mH mounted on the PR. The smaller 27 mH coil measured .27 mH by itself, and .28 mH mounted on the PR. The changes were in line with what I expected and no further adjustments were made. I also tested the inductors mounted on the PR with the magnet of the driver in its position close to the coils, but there was almost no measurable difference in inductance on either coil factoring in that variable.

Knowing the values were still good, I used hot glue and zip-ties to hold down the two inductors first, and then proceeded to work the rest of the components around them. With some fiddling, I was able to get everything wired point-to-point except for one ground jumper wire. The passive radiator has very good venting around it's basket and installing the components on the basket frame did little to restrict airflow around the rear of the PR.

So, after the .5 mH inductor (orange in pic) is hot glued flat , and the .27 mH inductor is hot glued upright, rolling towards the other inductor, and you're sure they will clear the opening into the cabinet, use zip ties to secure them to the PR basket as extra insurance.







Next, hot glue the 6.5 ohm resistor where shown on top of the larger coil.



Then in front of that, add the 4.7 uF cap securing it to both the coil and the resistor.



Next, add the 4.7 ohm resistor on the PR basket as shown, keeping things as snug as possible.



Then, add the 16 ohm resistor to the other side of the PR as shown in the picture.


On top of that, add the 5.1 uF cap approximately as shown in the picture below.


Now add the 2.2 uF cap as shown in the pic on top of the 6.5 ohm resistor and beside the 4.7 uF cap.


Wire things up following the schematic.



The only jumper I needed with this setup was to run a short ground line from the junction of the 16 ohm resistor and the 4.7 uF cap to the 4.7 ohm resistor on the tweeter circuit as shown in the pics below.





Since the tweeter has no markings on the wire or driver itself to indicate what the polarity is. I took a guess and assumed that the copper colored wire (as opposed to the silver colored wire) was the positive (+) lead and wired it up under that assumption. I may be wrong on that assumption, but either way, wire the copper colored line to the positive connection on the crossover as indicated in the schematic. I cut some of the wire off the tweeters built-in leads as they were longer than necessary.

Projected Bass Response (blue):
Compared against driver in sealed box (red)


Omnimic Measured Response:


Bantams Impedance Plot:


This post was edited December 2019 to link pictures, sorry for the discontinuity.



Continued...

[tomzarbo]

Products Used:
Denovo .04 cu. ft. Micro Cabinet (PAIR) #300-7060 (1) $24.90
Dayton AMTPOD-4 Tweeter (PAIR) Crossover Parts:
Jantzen .50 mH Inductor Coil, 18 ga. #255-230 (2) $7.85 ea.
Erse .27 mH Inductor Coil, 18 ga. #266-810 (2) $5.42 ea.
Dayton Audio 5.1 uF Capacitor #027-423 (2) $2.79 ea.
Dayton Audio 2.2 uF Capacitor #027-415 (2) $1.87 ea.
Dayton Audio 4.7 uF Capacitor #027-422 (2) $2.79 ea.
Dayton Audio 16 ohm 10 watt Resistor #004-16 (2) $1.38 ea.
Dayton Audio 4.7 ohm 10 watt Resistor #004-4.7 (2) $1.38 ea.
Dayton Audio 6.5 ohm 10 watt Resistor #004-6.5 (2) $1.38 ea.

If you don't already have it parts:
Parts Express Speaker Gasket Tape 1/2" #260-542 (1) $9.25 ea.
Binding Post #260-301 (2) $2.37 ea.

Tips & Tricks:
I used a small 4" x 4" piece of denim insulation on the inside top of the cabinet. I ripped the piece of 2" thick insulation apart to yield two approx. 1" thick pieces, which I adhered to the inside of each cabinet with spray adhesive. I don't know if this made much of a difference as I didn't test its effectiveness, but hopefully it calms down any in-cabinet resonances a bit. If you left it out, however, it wouldn't probably be an issue.



Since the speaker box is so small, there is little room for deviation on where most of the components are placed. The passive radiator and binding post terminal on the back need to be almost exactly where they are in order to fit, as well as to not have any screws being driven into the end grain of the 1/2" thick MDF, which may cause a split in the wood.



Measure carefully and dry fit/mock up the pieces before cutting anything. The notch for the woofers terminals is a good example of being very careful. It is easy to remove just a bit too much material, then you will have a gap to fill. It's best to remove a bit at a time, then check fitment and repeat until it's perfect.

Another tip is to make sure the tweeter and gasket are where you want them in the baffle before gluing the baffle to the box. As I said, I had to remount one tweeter after the baffles were glued to the box and it was much more difficult to do that way.

Since the woofer is so small the woofers terminals end up being very close to the driver frame, so I put a few pieces of electrical tape on the basket to guard against accidental short-outs in case the terminals get pressed into the basket when mounted.



Two things to look at when assembling the crossover; make sure the components are able to fit through the opening on the cabinet several times during assembly. Also, make sure nothing gets too close to the moving weight in the center of the passive radiator as you hot glue things together. It's a good idea to make sure the components don't touch the woofer magnet as well, though if you lay them out as I show in the pictures, there should be enough room.

Conclusion:
I think this is an exceptional sounding speaker, especially given its size. It can produce a good bit of bass thanks in part to the passive radiator, which in this design yielded an almost first order roll-off before the downward turn of the 'knee' on the low end. The AMT tweeter has a nice high end with a bit of sparkle to it which I really like. Many tiny speakers sound decent, but won't play loud without distorting; Because of the amazing ND91-4, the Bantams can play a fair bit louder that you would expect -- and sound clean doing it. It doesn't seem that such a big sound should be able to come from such a tiny speaker box -- a testament to the quality designed into these two Dayton drivers.



I added some pics 12/2019 because of the blurred Photobucket links



TomZ

[Navy Guy]

Nice work Tom! You are way ahead of me.

[tomzarbo]

Thank you sirs.
I still have a few pics to get in there. Photobucket was not playing nice for me tonight. I'll try to get a few diagrams up tomorrow sometime.

[howard]

Tom,
Very impressive design and write up! I think that when i get a chance I will build a pair for my daughter.

[Wolf]

Can I see a system impedance plot, please?

Just some thoughts...
That 4.7 ohm will cause the impedance to go pretty low in the treble. The 16 ohm resistor will almost negate the coil's usefulness in series with it. Usually a much lower resistance is used as a damping resistor. Typical for me is 5 ohms or less. Without series resistance, the tweeter could become a challenging load.

That said- I like the premise, the finished look and implementation, and the design and construction. Who woulda thought the 3.5 PR would fit on those tiny boxes!?!?

Later,
Wolf

[mzisserson]

Very nice work Tom! I'll second Kerry's sentiments you are way ahead of me also!

Love your cabinet work. Always makes me Jealous.

[martyh]

Well done Tom! Are we supposed to have started already?? ;)

Marty

[tomzarbo]

Can I see a system impedance plot, please?

Just some thoughts...
That 4.7 ohm will cause the impedance to go pretty low in the treble. The 16 ohm resistor will almost negate the coil's usefulness in series with it. Usually a much lower resistance is used as a damping resistor. Typical for me is 5 ohms or less. Without series resistance, the tweeter could become a challenging load.

That said- I like the premise, the finished look and implementation, and the design and construction. Who woulda thought the 3.5 PR would fit on those tiny boxes!?!?

Later,
Wolf

I added an impedance graph above. Thanks for the kind words... you know a thing or two about micro speakers for sure. The tweeter impedance seems okay to me. I've played them on several amps at the loudest volumes they could do with various material and no issues.

I realize I don't always do the normal stuff crossover-wise... Yeah, I'm no crossover guru -- but I did work this out pretty well I think. I've gone through quite a few simulations and probably 4 or 5 'start overs' for a 'mental refresh', and this is what looked like it worked the best in my opinion. I have never worked with an AMT tweeter before either so that's uncharted territory for me, but I did put my time in on this design, probably 20+ hours on the crossover alone which is about all a guy of my mental constitution can stand!

Anyway, I thought you'd appreciate my efforts to squeeeze everything in there. I laughed when I removed the passive radiator disc after jig-sawing it and saw the two 'wings' where I actually cut into the box sides... that's tight!

Nice work Tom! You are way ahead of me.

Gracias sir!

Very nice work Tom! I'll second Kerry's sentiments you are way ahead of me also!

Love your cabinet work. Always makes me Jealous.

Thanks a lot. I figure with such small speakers, I should take the time for some decently applied veneer. I want to make another pair soon and I'm thinking of going with small curved cabinets and a slightly deeper profile. Maybe I'll go with a hardwood baffle and really fancy veneer for those.

In hopeful anticipation I worked my way through 4 or 5 different projects over the summer in case I was fortunate enough to be selected.

Well done Tom! Are we supposed to have started already?? ;)

Marty

Didn't you get the email? The first set had to be uploaded by October.... J/K
I had spent some time in the summer working on a few projects ahead of time, that helped me get a jump on things for sure. I kind of see this as a big honor and an even bigger responsibility, so I'm getting after it as best I can.

Tom,
Very impressive design and write up! I think that when i get a chance I will build a pair for my daughter.

I hope you do, I'd love to see some pics when it happens. They are just plain surprising sound-quality and volume wise. Turn 'em up, and they just get louder instead of sounding gritty. The only negative is that they cost a few bucks. If you compare them with the cost of a set of overnight sensations, you can really see the difference... but then again, the ONS are discounted as they are a kit, and the Bantams are HALF the size and still play pretty stinking loud with real bass output.

TomZ

[Chris Roemer]

Looks like a real nice "package", Tom.

[tomzarbo]

Thanks Chris,
It's a small package for sure.

***NOTE*** I would suggest using some small rubber feet or something grippy under them... After a few minutes of bass-heavy music they had both spun around 90 degrees and almost fell off the table. The weight of the PR in action 'jiggles' the cabinet enough to move it if it's on a smooth surface.

TomZ

[Wolf]

Impedance looks solid, Tommy! Thanks for humoring me. Yeah- I've made 'wings' a few times too with cutouts. This is a great example of shoehorning a project into a TINY box! I figured the practice with your edition of Quarks is what gave you the start at these little boogers.

Ode to a small speaker...

When the wires pull the speaker off the stand,
Or when they barely fit the palm of your hand,
Or internally they don't go as planned,
Then it's a small design.

When the bass makes them dance and oscillate,
and also you hyperventilate,
and you question the project's thermal state,
Then it's a small design.

When nothing else will fit inside,
then bending rules you past abide',
But all your logic's justified,
Then it's a small design.

If empty cabs weigh less than parts,
and going outside the box is art,
Then you'll know right from the start,
That it's a small design.

Later,
Wolf