I agree, not exactly a Helium - but an adaptation that will make sense for certain applications. I am curious as to how close the ND90 is as a drop-in to the ND91 from a crossover perspective. Looking at the graphs, the ND90 seems to have a few dB higher output above about 1.5 kHz. The ND91 has a breakup peak around 15 kHz that the ND90 doesn't show. As Jake suggests, this might wind up helping to balance the increased bass output that the ND90 will have in his enclosure. The Helium design as it is really is more of a balanced design than a perfectionist design due to the simple fact that small size and full-ish sound are top priorities. There is very limited space for port tubes and crossover components.
From a more conceptual standpoint, I have played with a few ND90 designs. For bass and box size, I wind up coming back to the ND105 as something I can get similar extension out of in the same enclosure size, but with more output capability due to the larger cone. The one thing that the ND90 does better is higher frequencies. So, if I get around to an ND90 design, it will probably be with something like one of the small AMT tweeters (the Mini-8 or the Pod-4) that really need to cross around 5 kHz.
From a more conceptual standpoint, I have played with a few ND90 designs. For bass and box size, I wind up coming back to the ND105 as something I can get similar extension out of in the same enclosure size, but with more output capability due to the larger cone. The one thing that the ND90 does better is higher frequencies. So, if I get around to an ND90 design, it will probably be with something like one of the small AMT tweeters (the Mini-8 or the Pod-4) that really need to cross around 5 kHz.
Comment