Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Synergy horn build

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • jhollander
    replied
    Mark, the pvc port mounting blocks are 1/2 inch MDF with a hole drilled to fit the outside of the PVC pipe. I cut 1 1/2 inch lengths of 2 inch pipe and glued the pipe to the MDF with yellow glue. If the holes in the MDF are two big you might have to use epoxy to get it to dry/ clue in a reasonable time.

    The hanger bolts are from bolt depot #8-32 x 1" their part number 13584

    I don't recall the board size for the x-o it's close to 9 by 5.5 inches but I can check my other computer Tuesday.

    Good luck

    Leave a comment:


  • shrub0
    replied
    Is this the pvc mounting flange?
    https://www.menards.com/main/plumbin...4449120294.htm

    Leave a comment:


  • shrub0
    replied
    John,
    Some questions for you.
    What is the part used to mount the woofer ports? What size hangar bolts do you recommend? What is the size of the crossover board?
    Sorry to bombard you with details, but I'm building this with my son and want to appear like I know what i'm doing.

    Leave a comment:


  • jhollander
    replied
    Mark, the Anarchy pair gains about 1 dB of sensitivity over the Dayton DCS165, but the F3 goes from 35 to 44. My thought is to leave the x-o alone and see if the extra sensitivity helps with the bass response.

    I'd consider shortening the port to get the bump in the bass response, but in this build the port is picking up some length gain from how close it is to the back of the box. If you intend to change the box depth the port may already be short enough.

    Leave a comment:


  • shrub0
    replied
    Nice John the new frequency response looks smooth! I'm just about to start my clone of your synergy horn. I am using the same tweeter and mid, but decided to try the exodus 6.5" woofer.

    Here are the specs:
    Qms: 6.7
    Qes: .55
    Fs: 53 Hz
    Vas: 7.23 L
    Xmax: 12 mm
    Sd: 127 cm^2
    Re: 3.81 Ohm
    Le: .42 mH

    Would you suggest any modifications to the woofer crossover?

    Leave a comment:


  • jhollander
    replied
    This is the updated x-o after Fort Wayne
    Last edited by jhollander; 09-26-2018, 01:33 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • jhollander
    replied
    I used Loctite power grab tube adhesive.  Silicone is to flexible and the epoxy is to runny.  I calculated the volume in AutoCAD.  I fit the port before adding the top panel.

    Leave a comment:


  • shrub0
    replied
    Should I use silicone caulk or epoxy to glue the pvc to wood and pvc to the midrange? Also how was the woofer enclosure volume calculated? I am planning on adding an inch or so of depth and height for an easier fit of the port. 

    Leave a comment:


  • jhollander
    replied
    Patrick/ John I enjoy your post and projects over at diyaudio. I like that plot. I've got a project for a budget pro 2 way and need to look at how JBL is getting that response. So where did the PT clone come from?

    Do you think the polar is more the waveguide than the CD?

    Leave a comment:


  • Patrick Bateman
    replied
    One of the reasons you might opt for a compression driver is because the polars may be more consistent. This is because waveguides need a very specific wavefront to produce consistent polars, and ideally the waveguide and the compression driver should be designed as a single unit.

    This isn't to discourage you from using domes; they have advantages too. But if you want insanely consistent polars, take a look at what JBL achieves with the 2408H-1 combined with the PT waveguides. Here's what I measured:



    Note how consistent it is.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bergarth
    replied
    Love to have something like this for theater application! OMG great work

    Leave a comment:


  • jhollander
    replied
    Doesn't look like you gain anything but higher SPL. The F3 is higher, distortion looks similar.

    Leave a comment:


  • shrub0
    replied
    Here's a link to the 8 ohm version, http://www.audioxpress.com/article/t...6-017r-anarchy
    I imagine the 4 ohm would be close. I thought the anarchy might have less distortion than the dcs165,

    Leave a comment:


  • jhollander
    replied
    Shrub0, where are you seeing the specs? The only benefit is going to be is if they can hit a lower F3 in the same volume. If you are looking for higher SPL we're likely to run out of mid and tweeter before the woofers x-max. Of course you have to refigure the stand off rings and maybe the cabinet to fit these in.

    Response wise it may not be much of an issue as the port holes will control most of the FR.

    Leave a comment:


  • shrub0
    replied
    Would the anarchy woofer work in your Synergy Horn? http://www.diysoundgroup.com/anarchy-woofer.html
    If so, would it be an upgrade? It seems to model well in a 20L vented box but I'm not sure how the slots into the horn change the frequency response.
    Sorry to bombard you with questions John, but I plan to build your design with my son, when the weather warms up.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X