the 3ohm is part of the LCR ? and not separate ?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Next ?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by filmslayer View Postthe 3ohm is part of the LCR ? and not separate ?
There's not actually a R on the midrange LCR. The resistance shown is whatever dcr the coil has. Smaller R yield a deeper notch. I edited post 75.
Comment
-
Originally posted by filmslayer View Postthats confusing AF ! 20 parts in a tweeter circuit ?
The mid notch is parallel leg 2. Could be leg 1 or 3. I happened to use leg 2.
Comment
-
This forum software and my computer don't work well together. I have to reload, and log in again, and post within about 20 seconds, or it signs me out "due to inactivity". So some of my posts are rushed. Others, I copy, then reload, then log back in, then find the post I want to reply to, click on it, paste the copied reply, and click save. I've likely logged in more than 30 times in the last 2 hours.
Comment
-
Originally posted by rpb View PostThis forum software and my computer don't work well together. I have to reload, and log in again, and post within about 20 seconds, or it signs me out "due to inactivity". So some of my posts are rushed. Others, I copy, then reload, then log back in, then find the post I want to reply to, click on it, paste the copied reply, and click save. I've likely logged in more than 30 times in the last 2 hours.
Comment
-
Originally posted by filmslayer View Postrpb , 2nd order mid and woofer and 3rd order tweet correct ? i should be able to suss it and get it laid out in Xsim . not sure if i'm gonna have all the parts on hand so we may need to tweak a bit 4.7mH for 5 and .2mh for .3 are two know already ....
If you do a screen capture, and paste it in Paint, you can save it as a jpeg, and upload it to this forum.
Some of my second order filters may have an added resistor making them a damped 2nd order. This comes in handy on occasion.
One other thing. I play with PCD, but do my filters largely by trial and error. My driver zmas are not accurate, so I get less agreement between PCD, and actual response. So, I measure the filtered driver response to see if each driver is rolling off the way it should. Then I measure them together. At some point, I reverse a driver to see if there's a decent null. Then I listen while looking occasionally at the measurements. If I hear something slightly off, I can sometimes see it in the measurement, and make a small tweak. This is time consuming, but that's OK. With 3-ways, I make some additional close mic measurements to help me see what is happening down around 300hz better. My gated measurements become less accurate that low. But some how, some way, I arrive at a finished x-over. Usually, I scrap a 3-way design due to x-over complexity. I also prefer smaller speakers in my room, although I get the urge from time to time to make something massive. I think if big speakers weren't so heavy, I'd build more of them. I have a 7 cu-ft sub in my closet for HT use, but seldom need it for music.
Comment
-
Originally posted by filmslayer View Posti used -.10" on the mids and -.75" for the woofer assuming the tweet as 0 .. but after a good look at the tweet it sits back a bit so i'm not really sure .
Comment
-
a long post , you found the remember me button ?
i understand and thats what i'm trying to do . i don't think i was that far off at all besides the fact that i was assuming a 89db woofer when in fact it's closer 83db .
my woofer is 2.4 mH , 40uF (s)
mid : 1.8r , 12uF ,2mH (s) , 30uF , .5mH , (4.7uF-3.3r) (s) .1mH
tweet : 5r , 3.3uF , .2mH (s) , 6.8uF , .5mH (s)
**** (s) denotes shunt ..
Comment
Comment