A few weeks ago, I took a stab at building my first speaker. I used the measurement technique suggest in Jeff Bagby's paper found at the link below:
When I built the bookshelf, I worked with files containing minimum phase (extracted via Frequency Response Blender).
I wanted to know whether I can used the same technique for a such a low crossover point (e.g. 200hz). I could try outside ground plane measurements, but it won't be easy to haul the cabinets outside (and find a quite place).
In my mind, I was thinking about:
1) Taking Tweeter, Mid, Woofer measurements from a distance of 40" on tweeter axis
2) Taking nearfield measurements of the Mid and adjusting for baffle step loss
3) Merge Mid's nearfield and farfield response measurements using Frequency Response Blender and extract minimum phase
4) Taking nearfield measuremnts of the Woofer and adjusting for baffle step loss
5) Merge Woofer's nearfiled and fairfield response measurements using Frequency Response Blender and extract minimum phase
Will the steps above give me workable file?
When taking measurements inside the house, I can probably get close to 4ms gating for the Tweeter and Mid and probably 3ms for the Woofer. I understand I would need the woofers gating to be extended, but given that all measurements must be taken without moving the mic, and I'm trying to place the Tweeter and Mid as close to the middle between ceiling and floor, the woofer will end up being much closer to the floor.
Any thoughts?
When I built the bookshelf, I worked with files containing minimum phase (extracted via Frequency Response Blender).
I wanted to know whether I can used the same technique for a such a low crossover point (e.g. 200hz). I could try outside ground plane measurements, but it won't be easy to haul the cabinets outside (and find a quite place).
In my mind, I was thinking about:
1) Taking Tweeter, Mid, Woofer measurements from a distance of 40" on tweeter axis
2) Taking nearfield measurements of the Mid and adjusting for baffle step loss
3) Merge Mid's nearfield and farfield response measurements using Frequency Response Blender and extract minimum phase
4) Taking nearfield measuremnts of the Woofer and adjusting for baffle step loss
5) Merge Woofer's nearfiled and fairfield response measurements using Frequency Response Blender and extract minimum phase
Will the steps above give me workable file?
When taking measurements inside the house, I can probably get close to 4ms gating for the Tweeter and Mid and probably 3ms for the Woofer. I understand I would need the woofers gating to be extended, but given that all measurements must be taken without moving the mic, and I'm trying to place the Tweeter and Mid as close to the middle between ceiling and floor, the woofer will end up being much closer to the floor.
Any thoughts?
Comment