No announcement yet.

Budget Duelund Three-way

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Have you played them much yet?


    • #77
      Originally posted by gregrueff View Post
      I couldn't figure out a way to overlay the two measurements in the OmniMic program and show the phase of both, so I guess we just have to compare the two side-by-side like this?
      I have an improved (UI changes) version of this, haven't uploaded yet, busy with other things, but you can use this version to see magnitude and phase of any number of measurements.


      WinPCD - Windows .NET Passive Crossover Designer

      Dave's Speaker Pages


      • #78
        Good stuff Dave.
        Thanks for your work.

        I spent some time this morning seeing if I could tilt the listening lobe the final 3 degrees by tweaking some values.
        I was not able to do so, so the crossover between the midrange and tweeter may very well be complete.

        I also explored raising the crossover point between the woofer and the midrange.
        The system sweep shows that the HD3 exhibits a 10 dB rise from 150 Hz to 500 Hz, but otherwise stays about 60 dB down for most of the range.
        I had wondered if this was a result of crossing the TG9 over too low where the shortcomings of its small diameter become apparent.

        So here is the baseline (Rev11) measured on the tweeter's axis at 24 inches:
        Click image for larger version

Name:	Rev 11 HD at 24 inches, 90 dB fund.jpg
Views:	420
Size:	101.4 KB
ID:	1465361

        And here is (Rev12) under the same measurement conditions. The crossover is shifted up 100Hz:
        Click image for larger version

Name:	Rev 12 HD at 24 inches, 90 dB fund.jpg
Views:	406
Size:	101.9 KB
ID:	1465362

        Darn near identical.
        I suppose I could experiment moving that crossover point even higher, but we're really deviating from the Duelund concept at that point (without recalculating all the slopes from scratch) and it kind of goes against one of the original system goals. I had always wanted to push the crossover between the woofer and the midrange fairly low as a means to try to eliminate as much IMD as possible.

        I have only just now set them up to listen to music through them.
        I anticipate maybe having to play with the woofer alignment, but then again maybe not.

        With the stuffing they are currently pretty darn clos to critically damped (0.5). This may well suit them because I intend to place them in bookshelves. But I am curious to hear the difference with the alignment closer to flat (0.707).


        • #79
          I've seen enough strange distortion measurements with my speakers, that I don't take them very seriously. It can be maddening trying to figure out why a peak in the distortion suddenly shows up during xo work.


          • #80
            Listening to music through these, a couple things are clear.

            These require a subwoofer for good tonal balance. They sound too thin played by themselves. But that was always the plan anyway.
            If anyone were to build these and plan to not use a subwoofer, I would recommend they build it as a floor stander (if space permitted) and vent it to get good bottom end response.
            This woofer requires a fairly large volume to go vented which is partly why I went sealed to begin with. On that same note, I think a maximally stuffed enclosure and resultant critical response rolls off too soon to properly integrate with a subwoofer. I think maximally flat allows for better integration.

            I've spent a lot of time tweaking the resister values on the midrange and tweeter. I'm not sure that I can say which is best and it probably comes down to personal preference. If anyone were to build these, I would again recommend they pick up a couple extra values to tweak to their own taste. My first iteration had the midrange a little high and the vocals were unbelievably clear, but a little too forward. It'd be perfect as a center channel for a Christopher Nolan movie.

            Also, at moderate listening levels I can't get any crossover component even warm. I'm using single electrolytic caps on the woofer shunt and midrange high-pass and single resistors everywhere. I take safety seriously and can remember when someone almost caught their Statements on fire eons ago, but I'm just not seeing it here. I'm trying to think of a way to stress these that doesn't involve running them at party listening levels for hours on end.

            Overall I'm very pleased.
            I still need to build the final crossover boards and decide how to finish the cabinets, and I'm not sure I'll spend the time anymore on the FR anomaly at 7.5 kHz because I'm not sure I hear anything off.



            • #81
              Do you hear anything special about the sound that is noticeably different than your regular speakers? Soundstaging/imaging? I haven't started on my project yet - will definitely be buying the woofers with the stimulus check lol. Not sure what direction I want to go though.....traditional three way, try my hand at this type of project....a MTW arrangement.....a foam waveguide around the mid and tweeter? Time-aligning the drivers just to get the most out of the inexpensive drivers? The possibilities ;-P


              • #82
                Originally posted by shudson105 View Post
                Do you hear anything special about the sound that is noticeably different than your regular speakers?
                Gosh that's kind of tough.
                But no, not really. They just sound really clear to me and just right.

                I'm not good at the hyperbole (although I am from Louisville, Kentucky and have been around Rick Pitino for most of my life) but I think they're just speakers without obvious flaws.
                I personally don't subscribe to the notion that some magical crossover is going to be the acoustic equivalent of the Sistine chapel, but they do follow some very well thought out and published research regarding sound reproduction.

                The FR is relatively flat, with no controlled directivity. The listening axis is not dictated by any one specific position. This is mostly a function of my lifestyle. I don't listen in one place for long.

                The power response is smooth and steadily decreasing with frequency. It follows very closely to what Geddes describes as ideal. That is both a function of rolling off 2nd order, or more precisely adhering to the Duelund slopes but also the diameters of the drivers and their corresponding inherent directivity.

                HD is kept relatively low, although I still consider these budget drivers. They work within their respective passbands. This results in a very neutral sound (the best I can describe is grey, like the color) that is noticeably absent of the warm 2nd order tones I'm used to from my RS125P (which I like).

                The breakup on the DA215 is around 30 dB down, which is the target presented in Olive's work.

                The cabinet construction is one of my best efforts yet to overbrace in an effort to push the cabinet modes and resonances as high as I can to be absorbed by the copious amounts of stuffing employed in both the midrange chamber and bass cabinet.

                The midrange chamber is way overstuffed and awesome.

                The crossover between the midrange and bass driver was optimized as best I could to minimize intermodulation distortion, both from the bass driver and midrange driver, given that they both have relatively budget motors. You don't want the bass driver playing too high and you don't want the midrange playing too low.

                The bass alignment as first built was critically damped and the transient response was ideal. I've now deviated from that slightly to get better integration with the subwoofer.

                The bass response rolls off around 100Hz, where it is more ideally reproduced by multiple subs at strategic locations within the room to help balance out room modes.

                The aesthetic is something I can keep in my living room that my wife can live with.

                And..... I'm sure I'm missing something but that's all I have for now.



                • #83
                  Crossovers are assembled and complete.

                  I ended up making the midrange and tweeter padding resistors removable for easy changeout, since I can't really make up my mind what I like.
                  Currently the tweeter has a 6 ohm resister and the midrange has a 4 ohm resister which tilts the total response down a bit. This also helps the nominal impedance of the speaker substantially.
                  I did prove out that a 3.3 uF cap on the tweeter gives the best alignment between the midrange and tweeter.


                  Click image for larger version

Name:	completed crossovers_s.JPG
Views:	234
Size:	270.3 KB
ID:	1472302


                  • #84
                    Nicely done!!
                    "Wolf, you shall now be known as "King of the Zip ties." -Pete00t
                    "Wolf and speakers equivalent to Picasso and 'Blue'" -dantheman
                    "He is a true ambassador for this forum and speaker DIY in general." -Ed Froste
                    "We're all in this together, so keep your stick on the ice!" - Red Green aka Steve Smith

                    *InDIYana event website*

                    Photobucket pages:

                    My blog/writeups/thoughts here at PE:


                    • #85
                      I'm calling these the Scarabs.
                      I kind of like the way they look without their grilles.

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	Scarabs_s.jpg
Views:	141
Size:	386.3 KB
ID:	1475827


                      • LOUT
                        LOUT commented
                        Editing a comment
                        The squared-frame midwoofer and custom-truncated tweeter look really sharp next to eachother like that. Looks like you pulled the grill off of something you bought rather than something homemade (in a good way).

                    • #86
                      Really nice looking work!


                      • #87
                        Those really look great! Excellent work!


                        • #88
                          Thanks for the kind words.
                          They turned out better than I expected, both aesthetically and sonically.


                          • #89
                            Simply marvelous! They take me back a few decades.