1. No. the 0.68n(ohm) is NOT a resistor, it's the DCR (resistive component) of the coil (inductor) winding.
The 16n IS a resistor that's inline w/the tiny notch cap (to prevent a "short" of high or very high frequencies from reaching the amp).
There are only 3 physical components there: series coil, a tiny cap, and a resistor inline w/the cap.
2. The 75uF cap passes highs around the woofer (meaning it won't play as high up as the woofer w/OUT the parallel cap).
3. Funny thing is that both woofers are wired in series. It won't matter which one you put the cap "across" (in the schematic). The only thing that matters is that the cap is in parallel w/whichever woofer gets mounted lower (farther from the tweeter) in the box.
3.(again) - I mentioned in a post UP^THERE how you could just run the woofer pair (w/one bypassed by a large cap) just to check the feasibility of this topology (since at least someone here, at sometime in the past, claimed that this won't work "properly" - for some reason).
The 16n IS a resistor that's inline w/the tiny notch cap (to prevent a "short" of high or very high frequencies from reaching the amp).
There are only 3 physical components there: series coil, a tiny cap, and a resistor inline w/the cap.
2. The 75uF cap passes highs around the woofer (meaning it won't play as high up as the woofer w/OUT the parallel cap).
3. Funny thing is that both woofers are wired in series. It won't matter which one you put the cap "across" (in the schematic). The only thing that matters is that the cap is in parallel w/whichever woofer gets mounted lower (farther from the tweeter) in the box.
3.(again) - I mentioned in a post UP^THERE how you could just run the woofer pair (w/one bypassed by a large cap) just to check the feasibility of this topology (since at least someone here, at sometime in the past, claimed that this won't work "properly" - for some reason).
Comment