Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Introducing: The Pit Vipers (Ooh Yeah!!!)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Paul K.
    commented on 's reply
    I did model what Paul C. built and documented. The 2.83v/1m sensitivity came out to ~93 dB SPL, but that did not include baffle step compensation, so the final sensitivity should be about 89-90 dB SPL I'm estimating. My modeling also showed Paul C's intentions in that around 150 Hz, the output starts rising as frequency decreases, ending up almost 3 dB higher at 50 Hz or so. Paul C. did state after I sent him these modeling results that they were pretty much what he got.
    Paul K.

  • rpb
    replied
    What would you estimate the 2.83v sensitivity of the speaker.

    Leave a comment:


  • invaderzim
    replied
    I know these are referred to as 'party speakers' but how do they do at lower volume levels? I know there is the whole thing with how we perceive music at lower volumes but some of the speakers I've done sound good at low, late night levels and others sound really thin.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paul K.
    commented on 's reply
    I know. Just kidding around. BTW, what is the resistance value of the 5.0-mH inductor in the woofer's crossover? I only ask because it affects Qts, which in turn affects the optimum system tuning frequency for the TL I've modeled for you.
    Paul

  • Wolf
    commented on 's reply
    I couldn't get a .zip file to upload to the InDIYana site for the last challenge. Basically told me it was not supported.

    I think i used to know how to attach a link to things, but then the interface changed and it's a lot different now. If i figure it out, I'll let you know.

  • Serenitynow
    replied
    Oh , one more request.
    Would you please post a pic of your completed crossover board for visual layout reference ?
    Thanks again

    Leave a comment:


  • Serenitynow
    replied
    💥💥💥💥
    thank you paul
    that's perfect

    Leave a comment:


  • Paul Carmody
    commented on 's reply
    I'm not done with you yet, Mr. Kittinger! I just wanted to get this version out the door first. We will speak soon!

  • Paul Carmody
    replied
    Bill of Materials here

    Leave a comment:


  • Paul Carmody
    commented on 's reply
    Oops!! Thanks for the heads-up. Fixed.

  • Paul Carmody
    commented on 's reply
    Yeah, so Google Sites has this stupid thing where I don't know how to make an image a clickable link. The workaround to ALL the photos on my site is to either Right-Click -> Save As... or Right-Click -> Open in a New Tab.

    If anyone out there is a Google Sites whiz and knows how to fix this, I'm all ears.

  • djg
    commented on 's reply
    On my Windows pc, I "save image as" a jpg and then I can open it and it's larger, legible and expandable. Never had a Chromebook. Google is evil. Bill gates too, but not so much, he just wants us to eat bugs.

  • Serenitynow
    replied
    Originally posted by rpb View Post

    I'm not building Pauls design. I most likely would use drivers I have on hand.
    oh ok. I understand

    Leave a comment:


  • rpb
    replied
    Originally posted by Serenitynow View Post

    Why wouldn't you need to know the values of the components ?
    I'm not building Pauls design. I most likely would use drivers I have on hand.

    I'm a xo nerd. I just like to see how others choose to design.

    Leave a comment:


  • Serenitynow
    replied
    Originally posted by rpb View Post

    With my chrome book computer, the xo you show stays small, and I can't read any of the values at all. I don't need them, but I like to look.
    Why wouldn't you need to know the values of the components ?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X