If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If you have an immediate customer service issue, please visit us at Parts Express
It looks to me that they moved the location of the dome forward, so that it projects above the face plate. That would explain the better response in the top octave shown in the graph. But that's just my guess. I would love to get these in my hands to test them!
It looks to me that they moved the location of the dome forward, so that it projects above the face plate. That would explain the better response in the top octave shown in the graph. But that's just my guess. I would love to get these in my hands to test them!
-Charlie
Too bad the sensitivity took a hit.
Now, according to the spec sheet, both the RS28A and RS28F have 88dB/1W input, yet the RS28a spec sheet shows a 91dB sensitivity where the RS28F shows 88dB. I wonder if both are actually using 1W or if the RS28A is getting 2W for the chart on the PDF?
Last edited by Pete Schumacher; 11-10-2009, 02:10 PM.
Reason: inconsistent data?
Very interesting indeed. Nothing like an Usher 9950 or 9930 dome. I might have to cabbage onto a pair of these to play around with. Dig through the sofa time I guess.
I'll take a WAG that it's sharing quite a bit of DNA with an Usher 9950-20. The mesh grille was throwing me off for one thing. Comparing specs between the two, it's like the RS is a 4Ω version of my favorite tweeter. There are differences in their frequency response plots but I wonder if it has to do with possible differences in test baffles and such. Still this is a big honkin' blip on my radar now. Can't ignore it.
As usual, they don't have Force Factor, Xmax, and Mms specs... seems for that much money, one could get the basic specs!!
Although Xmax would be nice, the other specs that you mention are not really all that relevant for a tweeter... I too would like to see some off-axis response plots.
But it seemed to be met with a good bit of disagreement.
I agree... BxL can be part of telling one what type of "dynamics" a driver has... Mms (and Fs) can tell one what type of "tone" to expect... and Xmax also dynamics.
Full "Q" specs would also be nice for tweeters... all these specs are important "guesstimations" about a tweeter's "tone", and output.
I would never buy a mid or tweeter without off axis curves.
"He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you." Friedrich Nietzsche
Yes, the reason I'm always suspicious when there is something basic missing is the fact we all know that the manufacturer tested for them. When there is something so basic as off axis missing, it just tells me there's something not quite right here. TB is notorious for this. You are hard pressed to find off axis measurements for anything they produce. That's why I never buy unless there are good graphs as a starting point or if someone I trust used the product and will give me an unbiased opinion. Sure slows the purchasing process.
Comment