Originally posted by davepellegrene
View Post
For example, I wonder if a very deep rabbet joint, with maybe just 1/16" to 1/8" of material remaining on the outside piece would show less than a standard **** joint, since it the joint is very near the corner and the glue would likely permeate that narrow section quite well. Obviously a narrow lip like this would be very easy to break off, so that would certainly be a potential drawback.
Also, rather than doing roundovers, might one do chamfers and place the chamfer edge right on the seam. Might that mask the effect of expansion?
Is the amount of expansion changed by the surface hardness of the mdf? Could it be sanded to remove the harder layer at the surface and in that way reduce the potential expansion?
I think this kind of construction technique options might be a good addition to your testing of treatments, if you are interested in exploring them. It just seems to make sense to try and address the problem at the source rather than treat it afterward. A combination of a change in construction techniques and simple seam treatment may offer the easiest solution.
BTW, how did you do the trenches?
Leave a comment: