If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If you have an immediate customer service issue, please visit us at Parts Express
Ok, sorry to get a teensy bit off topic, but now that I've installed a new W7 compatible DVD drive, and then Windows Office, which has allowed me to run PCD...
I'm having a wee bit of trouble generating a .zma with the response modeler portion. Attached is a screenshot of the spreadsheet 'in action'. I would appreciate it if anyone could give me a bonk on the head and let me know what I'm screwing up. Thanks!
In the meantime I'll just need to play with the tweeter :p.
bruson,
Have you tried inverting the polarity on the sub and measured?
I think that would be useful to A/B but at or near the listening position. Don't know if that is 2m.
I think it looks pretty good so far for a real world listening room.
Sub reverse polarity:
Normal Polarity:
All from my sitting position about 9 feet away.
With a simple polarity change, without touching the mic a lot of things changed.
I'm using the Dayton EMM6 mic and a Behringer Xenyx 502 pre.
Are they that sensitive?
I noticed when I move the mc 1/2 inch to an 1 inch lots of big changes happen. It can make my measurements lot OK or terrible.
ONE speaker at a time, unless the mic is precisely (within 1/8") on the acoustic center between them.
Are you doing that?
I am using only one speaker at a time. And the sub. No change except for the polarity on the sub.
Wild disparities happened multiple times at different measurements. Sometimes a huge midrange suck out, sometimes the tweeter rolled off steeply at 5K. Wacky. Or my inexperience is showing. Maybe something is intermittent and I haven't tracked it down yet. So I show the good readings not the great readings, too unbelievable. I also don't show the really fantasy crappy readings. I hope I figure it out soon.
My sub FR may look a little goosed because with 2 main speakers playing I think they add about 3db to all frequencies above 100hz. I may end up with reversed polarity when I go back to 2 main speakers so it adds a bit more bass for taste.
If you can't replicate the results, excepting maybe for very LF when a truck rumbles by, then you have issues. I had that problem measuring in SoundEasy. So I gave up on that and went with different measuring software. If you don't change anything, and you're getting variable results, you might have some software problems as I did, or maybe intermittent switching in your system.
PS, get behind the mic and don't move around when measuring. : )
I am using only one speaker at a time. And the sub. No change except for the polarity on the sub.
Wild disparities happened multiple times at different measurements. Sometimes a huge midrange suck out, sometimes the tweeter rolled off steeply at 5K. Wacky. Or my inexperience is showing. Maybe something is intermittent and I haven't tracked it down yet. So I show the good readings not the great readings, too unbelievable. I also don't show the really fantasy crappy readings. I hope I figure it out soon.
My sub FR may look a little goosed because with 2 main speakers playing I think they add about 3db to all frequencies above 100hz. I may end up with reversed polarity when I go back to 2 main speakers so it adds a bit more bass for taste.
Particularly if you're using a laptop, try disabling the Wifi and Bluetooth adaptors in it. The drivers in some of them can cause all sorts of interference and stuttering in audio streams.
Will this thread never die? The horse is dead, it's bones are fossilized...
Lou's Speaker Site [speakers.lonesaguaro.com] "Different" is objective, "better" is subjective. Taste is not a provable fact. Where are you John Galt? I may not be worthy, but I'm ready.
If you can't replicate the results, excepting maybe for very LF when a truck rumbles by, then you have issues. I had that problem measuring in SoundEasy. So I gave up on that and went with different measuring software. If you don't change anything, and you're getting variable results, you might have some software problems as I did, or maybe intermittent switching in your system.
PS, get behind the mic and don't move around when measuring. : )
bwaslo:
Particularly if you're using a laptop, try disabling the Wifi and Bluetooth adaptors in it. The drivers in some of them can cause all sorts of interference and stuttering in audio streams.
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
I learned not to move around except to move my finger to click the mouse!
Still got highly variable readings.
So I think the software idea and bwaslo's idea of disabling things will be tried next.
I think I had too many other programs running at the same time. I'll try just Holmimpulse alone and see if I get better results.
Thanks!
Also played around with one third octave smoothing and my FR looks good enough for marketing purposes! What a joke.
Will this thread never die? The horse is dead, it's bones are fossilized....
Congratulations!! You scored Post #1001 -- thank you for your contribution. ;)
This thread is alive and well; hundreds of DIYers all over the world are designing and building EconoWaves according to the precepts documented here. Its role as a reference resource is reflected in the view count.
[There are at least three Mini-Ewaves that'll be migrating into "prime time" here shortly.... ]
Comment