Re: RSS315HF-4 as the anchor of a 3-way???
Boys boys boys . . . settle down now!!! :p
Hey Ryan,
Thanks again for the help.
Keep in mind that the need for a notch is especially important for an acoustic alignment like Troels used in the Ellam. He's got an LR4 @ 2800Hz implementation, which requires a flatter response to a higher frequency than the LR2 at 2200 I've got in the Byzantium. The Scan is already rolling off in the LR2 at 800Hz, but not in the Ellam. Without the notch, I can easily see how there could be too much energy at 800Hz.
I've been in the process of trying to get the measured data of the individual mid and tweet to line up with the combined response plot.
I traced the plots we took of the Scan and RS28, extracted minimum phase, and plugged them into the PCD model. The result was nothing like the measured combined response.
The only way I can get them even close is to actually push the acoustic center of the Scan forward of the tweeter by approximately 15mm, which is an interesting result in and of itself. Doing that seems to produce a plot that resembles the combined measured response reasonably well.
Since doing that, I've played around with the tweeter HP inductor in PCD, and with what we measured, a .25mH in place of the .5mH seems to do wonders for the phase match, as well as bring that area around 1KHz down. I wonder if some of that forwardness wasn't just the woofer being low, or even an issue with the Scan, but of too much contribution from the tweeter at that point. It's resonance is right where you were discussing the forward sound. Knocking down that inductor to .25mH reduces the tweeter output at that point by more than 5dB while only reducing the 1KHz summed level by 1dB. I've got some .25mH inductors laying around. I think I'll drop them into the circuit and give 'em a listen.
Stop by with your ears and tell me what you think!!! ;)
Boys boys boys . . . settle down now!!! :p
Hey Ryan,
Thanks again for the help.
Keep in mind that the need for a notch is especially important for an acoustic alignment like Troels used in the Ellam. He's got an LR4 @ 2800Hz implementation, which requires a flatter response to a higher frequency than the LR2 at 2200 I've got in the Byzantium. The Scan is already rolling off in the LR2 at 800Hz, but not in the Ellam. Without the notch, I can easily see how there could be too much energy at 800Hz.
I've been in the process of trying to get the measured data of the individual mid and tweet to line up with the combined response plot.
I traced the plots we took of the Scan and RS28, extracted minimum phase, and plugged them into the PCD model. The result was nothing like the measured combined response.
The only way I can get them even close is to actually push the acoustic center of the Scan forward of the tweeter by approximately 15mm, which is an interesting result in and of itself. Doing that seems to produce a plot that resembles the combined measured response reasonably well.
Since doing that, I've played around with the tweeter HP inductor in PCD, and with what we measured, a .25mH in place of the .5mH seems to do wonders for the phase match, as well as bring that area around 1KHz down. I wonder if some of that forwardness wasn't just the woofer being low, or even an issue with the Scan, but of too much contribution from the tweeter at that point. It's resonance is right where you were discussing the forward sound. Knocking down that inductor to .25mH reduces the tweeter output at that point by more than 5dB while only reducing the 1KHz summed level by 1dB. I've got some .25mH inductors laying around. I think I'll drop them into the circuit and give 'em a listen.
Stop by with your ears and tell me what you think!!! ;)
Comment