If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If you have an immediate customer service issue, please visit us at Parts Express
The additional links at the bottom to the guy painting the computer case are actually really good. It's not MDF but aside from the prep work, much of the info is very transferable and detailed.
Automotive paint on MDF can be quite challenging but it all depends on the end result that you want. Several Factors to take into consideration are paint color (darker colors tend to show more details) so results will be highlighted more than with lighter colors. Sealing the MDF, several layers of good quality primer, sanding are essential before paint is applied.
Like I said it all depends of the end result desired. A more mirror like finish will require more work before paint is applied.
The additional links at the bottom to the guy painting the computer case are actually really good. It's not MDF but aside from the prep work, much of the info is very transferable and detailed.
The additional links at the bottom to the guy painting the computer case are actually really good. It's not MDF but aside from the prep work, much of the info is very transferable and detailed.
When I worked at a car stereo place we used hi build poly primer. It's not cheap as last time I spent $50 for a quart but it adheres and coats really thick. Real easy to sand as well.
Lots of talk regarding preping MDF for painting, how about the final finish technique? After clear coat, sand and polish? What are the favorite techniques on the final steps?
I tend to do the long and time-consuming way mainly because that's the only way that has worked for me to my satisfaction.
I use the 50/50 glue mixture, sand, then Filler-Primer, sand until smooth, then paint (usually with RustOleum, but have recently tried the HVLP "much better and faster results") the base coat. Usually takes 3-4 coats with sanding after the 2nd coat to 400, this is where I differ from some other techniques, after the final medium-heavy base coat I wait 24-48 hours and then sand up to 800 wet/dry on that final base coat.
Once I get the surface buttery smooth, then I go with 2-3 light coats of a clear gloss (again RustOleum), let dry for 24 hours and sand up to 1500 wet/dry making sure all runs, orange peel and imperfections are gone.
Last step is 2 final medium-heavy coats of clear gloss again. Let this dry for 48 hours so it's nice and hard.
Now the fun part, sand with 800 wet, 1500 wet, 2500 wet, then move to Cutting Compound (Medium), then Polish and then finally Cleaner/Wax (I use Meguiars, but any high-quality product will give good results, and it makes a big difference what you use) I also suggest you buy a $40 electric buffer, otherwise these sanding/polishing steps will take a full day, rather than a couple hours.
Once you are done, be sure and let it dry for at least a week. the paint will still be soft, so any pressure (sitting on a terry cloth, or anything that's not smooth) will leave an imprint. I know this from experience, it sucks to have it happen after 3 days of painting/sanding/polishing!
Lots of talk regarding preping MDF for painting, how about the final finish technique? After clear coat, sand and polish? What are the favorite techniques on the final steps?
I never use mdf but it's certainly possible to edge band. I have often used edge banding on plywood boxes. My point was strictly that that router bit was as difficult to setup as the ones for hardwood that make a spline on the center. I still haven't gotten it setup satisfactorily after several tries. It's not a make or break for me because I never stain/poly plywood without veneer.
Fastbike, Would it be possible to edge band the exposed edge of the MDF before you glue up some ****joints with some birch or closed grain wood to eliminate the exposed MDF edge..........you could used some decent thickness on the edge band material (1/16-1/8)......at least on the sides your going to see, on the hidden sides you could probably pass if you wanted to save a little effort.
That won't hide the visibility of a joint line or seam.
It will change the appearance somewhat, but won't stop it.
As an aid to sealing the edge to stop excess finish absorption it seems a bit overkill. There are numerous easy ways to accomplish that task.
Any form of miter joint will be effective but miters aren't always an option. Take a curved cabinet for example. Or where other design elements preclude them or make them too difficult to cut/assemble.
Fastbike, Would it be possible to edge band the exposed edge of the MDF before you glue up some ****joints with some birch or closed grain wood to eliminate the exposed MDF edge..........you could used some decent thickness on the edge band material (1/16-1/8)......at least on the sides your going to see, on the hidden sides you could probably pass if you wanted to save a little effort.
Sadly, a lot harder to get edges lined up than it seems. I'm still having trouble after 4 or 5 tries. Viewed the video several times.
Fastbike, Would it be possible to edge band the exposed edge of the MDF before you glue up some ****joints with some birch or closed grain wood to eliminate the exposed MDF edge..........you could used some decent thickness on the edge band material (1/16-1/8)......at least on the sides your going to see, on the hidden sides you could probably pass if you wanted to save a little effort.
You do like to place a big piece of felt between the woofer and tweeter though. A think flange might affect tweeter diffraction with some tweeters on an untreated baffle.
The flange has an influence, but it's negligible in my testing. The resulting flange geometry makes it more highly distributed in time than does most baffle edges and the angle with regard to the listener probably reduces the impact further.
I do (always) place felt in between a tweeter and any adjacent driver (midrange or woofer) due to the diffraction associated with the extreme depression and larger surface area of the diaphragm. The flange diffraction change is largely incidental. If you surface or flush mount a woofer by a tweeter, you'll likely not see a lot of difference in the diffraction signature on any given axis.
This was made more apparent with my 2-way using an Accuton mid-woofer. The latter showed more diffraction than any other similar sized driver I've tested. That's probably due to the nearly purely concave shape (no vent cover) and the material. There's so little damping in the Accuton diaphragm vs. others. This latter is more conjecture, but the stronger diffraction signature was not. It's easy to test. Measure a raw tweeter that's mounted by the woofer. Then cover the woofer with a good, flat material and measure the tweeter raw again. The difference is uniquely the change in diffraction. Normalize the two and you have the pure diffraction signature of the woofer to the tweeter response If the woofer is not recessed, you'll still have some residual woofer flange diffraction. Then add felt. This should remove almost all woofer diffraction at that point.
BTW, if I had a smallish midrange (4" or smaller probably) close to a woofer in a 3way, I suspect that I would place felt between those as well, though the change would almost surely be much smaller.
I have never recessed a woofer. The benefit is purely cosmetic.
dlr
You do like to place a big piece of felt between the woofer and tweeter though. A think flange might affect tweeter diffraction with some tweeters on an untreated baffle.
The finish on the cherry was General Finishes Arm-R-Seal wiped on, not brushed. It's easy to get a very smooth surface with it. Bob recommends micro-fiber towels for wiping, but I've used T-shirt pieces and some industrial wipes in the past too.
I'm not sure why the larger drivers are not recessed, and there's even a warning against doing it. Perhaps Linkwitz didn't worry about diffraction at low frequencies and took measurements with the current mounting. The tweeters apparently don't require it because they have a flange that tapers to a knife-edge to smoothly meet their sub-baffle. The bottom line is that I'm guessing, and that I don't really know why.
Woofer mounting will play no real role at low frequencies. Even at midrange frequencies the wavelengths are long enough that it's primarily just the baffle width that gets involved.
Leave a comment: