I've been finding myself less and less happy with my otherwise serviceable Wharfedale 8.2a studio monitors, and I've been giving some thought to building my own replacement. Here's where I'm coming from:
1) I'm having troubles mixing the midrange. I've also learned that this really is the most important part to get right.
2) I also have trouble in the lows, but not as much. A quick listen on any other system helps me here. Still, if I can make improvements here, I should.
3) Highs are the most easily correctable range. I seem to have the least trouble here.
To that end, I'm thinking:
1) The Dayton RS100-4 or -8 full-range driver is looking pretty good to me. This is a very well-received unit that looks like it would cover the mids very well and the highs well enough. Correction in the highs could be made in the crossover, or even digitally at the output of the DAW. (I would probably buy a measurement mic to test such things.)
2) Combine that with a good woofer or subwoofer to fill in the lows. Something that gives excellent transient response. Again, frequency response can be corrected many different ways.
3) The distortion figures have to be best in the midrange. The lows and highs can slip a bit, though not too much, obviously. Even with the worst speakers, though, it's not tough to tell what sounds in a mix are supposed to sound distorted and which are not.
4) My mind immediately wants to go to a sealed cabinet, as I remember reading that those were easiest to design for good transient response. However, the RS100-* seems to like a ported cabinet... ? It's been a while since I read up on the intricacies of speaker design.
Basically, the goal is to get as good of a midrange as possible, and the lows and highs can be corrected for, possibly even digitally. I know a lot of people will be railing against this idea for studio monitors, but I also remember a lot of people railing against digital room correction, which turned out to work just fine in many instances.
I also don't have an ideal studio. I have a treated area, but it's a smaller area inside a larger room, with a wall closer to one side of my monitors than the other. Here's a pic: http://www.flickr.com/photos/dmlandr...57624352963685
This turned out to be longer than I thought. Thank you for your time.
1) I'm having troubles mixing the midrange. I've also learned that this really is the most important part to get right.
2) I also have trouble in the lows, but not as much. A quick listen on any other system helps me here. Still, if I can make improvements here, I should.
3) Highs are the most easily correctable range. I seem to have the least trouble here.
To that end, I'm thinking:
1) The Dayton RS100-4 or -8 full-range driver is looking pretty good to me. This is a very well-received unit that looks like it would cover the mids very well and the highs well enough. Correction in the highs could be made in the crossover, or even digitally at the output of the DAW. (I would probably buy a measurement mic to test such things.)
2) Combine that with a good woofer or subwoofer to fill in the lows. Something that gives excellent transient response. Again, frequency response can be corrected many different ways.
3) The distortion figures have to be best in the midrange. The lows and highs can slip a bit, though not too much, obviously. Even with the worst speakers, though, it's not tough to tell what sounds in a mix are supposed to sound distorted and which are not.
4) My mind immediately wants to go to a sealed cabinet, as I remember reading that those were easiest to design for good transient response. However, the RS100-* seems to like a ported cabinet... ? It's been a while since I read up on the intricacies of speaker design.
Basically, the goal is to get as good of a midrange as possible, and the lows and highs can be corrected for, possibly even digitally. I know a lot of people will be railing against this idea for studio monitors, but I also remember a lot of people railing against digital room correction, which turned out to work just fine in many instances.
I also don't have an ideal studio. I have a treated area, but it's a smaller area inside a larger room, with a wall closer to one side of my monitors than the other. Here's a pic: http://www.flickr.com/photos/dmlandr...57624352963685
This turned out to be longer than I thought. Thank you for your time.
Comment