Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

~ 5" Coaxial drivers?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: ~ 5" Coaxial drivers?

    Congrats jay!

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: ~ 5" Coaxial drivers?

      Erin why no love for the b&c? The de7 compression driver is small-. 75 inch so off axis would be good. I have a de5, which is the .5 inch one and it sounds really good. Plus b&c has solid engineering and factory data. The voice coil test the other month would ha e the off axis data too.

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: ~ 5" Coaxial drivers?

        Originally posted by Pallas View Post
        Shoulda just called me. I could have sent you one. I'm using three Q100's up front temporarily at home (in addition to two for background music in the bedroom), which means I have a spare.
        I would have, if I knew it. I’ll PM you.

        Originally posted by Pallas View Post
        Also the neo motor, and the 3001 has a plastic basket whereas the Q100 has an alloy basket. And the cone material is different; the 3001 has a plastic-looking collar and then a paper cone. The Q100 has a metal cone. (But one of the best-controlled ones around, especially considering the price.)



        Not quite. Remember that the 3005 KEF eggs are "full range" little speakers. As a practical matter, they go down to about 120Hz. And they're fairly inefficient. Not dedicated mids, really. And the HTC3005SE (I'm using two of them as side-surround) "center channel" is not a 3-way design but a 2.5-way design. (They claim both in different places but after tracing the xover it's clearly a 2.5-way.) I don't know if the driver part number is different.
        Yea, unfortunately I didn’t see this mentioned in literature anywhere. The plastic basket seems of concern. Seems it may be subject to flex if the excursion is high enough (whatever that is I do not pretend to know). Sucks about inefficiency but I’ll have to see what the data says before I get concerned about it. I’m fine with mid 80’s. Below that and it starts to be a concern.

        Looking at the center, it certainly seems more like a 2.5 way than a 3-way.

        Originally posted by Pallas View Post
        In the DIYA LS50 thread, Jack commented that the thin surround of the 3001 was the transition to the Z-surround.
        I didn’t catch that. Good to know.

        Originally posted by Pallas View Post
        I wonder the context for that. I can think of way more than three. Maybe he just meant three 5" midwoofers?
        In the latest generation, there are 5 platforms: the 5" midwoofer (Q100/R100/LS50), 5" midrange (R300+), 5" flagship midrange (Blade), 6.5" midwoofer (Q300/Q700), and 8" midwoofer (Q900).
        And then the older ones (the 6.5" Reference midrange, the 3" one in the 1005-series, the 4" one in the 2005-series, and the 4.5" one in the 3005-series). And the in-wall ones, etc. So there are a lot of Uni-Q's.
        Yea, I’m not exactly sure what the context of that was.
        I’d love to get my hands on all the different Uni-Q drivers. I’m curious how tiered in performance the drivers are relative to the cost of the speakers they come as part of.

        Originally posted by Pallas View Post
        At any rate, I'll be back in a couple weeks. We're going abroad tomorrow. And coming back with new rings on our fingers. Cheers.
        Congrats. Enjoy your trip.
        ErinsAudioCorner.com

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: ~ 5" Coaxial drivers?

          is 5" a must the Seas T18RE is a nice speaker, i have one from the loki kit from madisound
          Music System- Pioneer PL-540 TT, Sansui AU11000A, Curt C's Invictus
          Other speakers built- Paul Carmody: Classix II, hitmakers, overnight sensations. Troels Gravessen: 3 way Classics, center-641

          Comment

          Working...
          X