Re: A Proposal from Jeff - Need your feedback
If you intend to perform an exercise like this more than once then don't video it. A video of a normal person (i.e. not a professional presenter) talking for hours to an interested audience doesn't work well on video compared to being in the audience. You can see this in many recordings of presentations on you-tube. But it is a cheap way to reach a larger audience. If you wish to use non-interactive video well then use its strengths which generally involves a lot of preparation, a small amount of talking heads, largely self contained navigable chunks, video clips, slides, animations,...
Teaching material with a significant interactive component generally takes 2 or 3 iterations before the presenter feels it is working as it should. It can be surprisingly difficult to work out beforehand how long it might take to get something across and whether it is worth the time. It is common to pick up during the teaching that you are using a bit of knowledge that the students don't have and you need to bring in. Similarly it can become clear that an item of two is of little to no interest.
Originally posted by Jeff B.
View Post
Teaching material with a significant interactive component generally takes 2 or 3 iterations before the presenter feels it is working as it should. It can be surprisingly difficult to work out beforehand how long it might take to get something across and whether it is worth the time. It is common to pick up during the teaching that you are using a bit of knowledge that the students don't have and you need to bring in. Similarly it can become clear that an item of two is of little to no interest.
Comment