Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is there interest in a large three way "monkey coffin" collaboration?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • wg_ski
    replied
    Re: Is there interest in a large three way "monkey coffin" collaboration?

    Personally, I would have liked to have seen 15's. But what we really wanted was 30 Hz, 92dB/W, and 8 ohms. And 15's are either high 80's that go deep in a huge box or mid 90's that only get to 40 (PA). This isn't the frist time I couldn't find 'the perfect 15' and punted to a 12. That s2 12" certainly splits the difference perfectly. These are going to end aup a lot like my first 'serious' non-PA speakers - 12" Ultimate car subs (old prototype of the current Series 2, actually), the old B11EC80 mid, and a slightly horn loaded dome tweet. Probably with a lot better crossover.... The tools we have now are better than back in the late 80s. I remember mesauring crossover responses with oscilloscopes and tweaking reverse phase nulls in by ear with a sine generator.

    Leave a comment:


  • ngjockey
    replied
    Re: Is there interest in a large three way "monkey coffin" collaboration?

    Hmmm, I wonder if you can run the mids without a high pass. Just a thought.

    Oops, that's a 2.5 way. Nevermind.

    Leave a comment:


  • filmslayer
    replied
    Re: Is there interest in a large three way "monkey coffin" collaboration?

    Originally posted by lorenmjones View Post
    Cool speakers. Is the 2.5 a reference to 2.5 way implementation?
    yes it is . though they started out life as a 3 way with off the shelf XO , i learned quickly that was not correct ...

    Leave a comment:


  • lorenmjones
    replied
    Re: Is there interest in a large three way "monkey coffin" collaboration?

    Cool speakers. Is the 2.5 a reference to 2.5 way implementation?

    Originally posted by filmslayer View Post
    i love big speakers , my first project was 2.5's in a 36" x 14.5" X 14.5" cab ...

    i'll conceived 2.5's

    Leave a comment:


  • ngjockey
    replied
    Re: Is there interest in a large three way "monkey coffin" collaboration?

    You can use higher sensitivity mids to assist the BSC, and that will help with your goals, but not with a 300 Hz xo. Lower.

    Leave a comment:


  • lorenmjones
    replied
    Re: Is there interest in a large three way "monkey coffin" collaboration?

    I see. That would be a little more reasonable...but who needs reasonable.

    Originally posted by isaeagle4031 View Post
    I have a pair of st305s in 2.5 cubes tuned to 35 hz IIRC. The dual 12s with the pm220 is just a thought. Though dual 10s is a more realistic possibility.

    Leave a comment:


  • isaeagle4031
    replied
    Re: Is there interest in a large three way "monkey coffin" collaboration?

    I have a pair of st305s in 2.5 cubes tuned to 35 hz IIRC. The dual 12s with the pm220 is just a thought. Though dual 10s is a more realistic possibility.

    Leave a comment:


  • lorenmjones
    replied
    Re: Is there interest in a large three way "monkey coffin" collaboration?

    You have 4 ST305's just sitting around?

    That would make a seriously rocking speaker. Those PM220's are nice but a little steep on the price for this concept.


    Originally posted by isaeagle4031 View Post
    You have picked an excellent array of drivers that should be fairly easy to work with. I have a set of series II woofs here already and may just build this myself. Plus I have a pair of pm220s to play with as well. Hmm dual 305s, pm220, waveguide loaded tweet?????

    Leave a comment:


  • isaeagle4031
    replied
    Re: Is there interest in a large three way "monkey coffin" collaboration?

    You have picked an excellent array of drivers that should be fairly easy to work with. I have a set of series II woofs here already and may just build this myself. Plus I have a pair of pm220s to play with as well. Hmm dual 305s, pm220, waveguide loaded tweet?????

    Leave a comment:


  • filmslayer
    replied
    Re: Is there interest in a large three way "monkey coffin" collaboration?

    i love big speakers , my first project was 2.5's in a 36" x 14.5" X 14.5" cab ...

    i'll conceived 2.5's

    Leave a comment:


  • Liberator of Magic Smoke
    replied
    Re: Is there interest in a large three way "monkey coffin" collaboration?

    Title of thread says "three way monkey coffin," not "big monitor."

    I like where this is heading. For around $400 in parts plus whatever the cabinet ends up costing, I can see quite a few people building these. Including myself. It's not hard to picture them being more or less permanent speakers in man-caves, shops, big open basements, gyms, and so on. With nice veneer and a good finish they'll look great. Made from plywood and painted black, with beer bottle resistant steel grilles, they would score a perfect zero in WAF. Lots of interesting possibilities.

    The budget is a good sweet spot, I think. Raise the price in search of more efficiency or whatever, and a lot of us will say, "Well if I'm going to spend a grand on speakers..."

    Leave a comment:


  • andy19191
    replied
    Re: Is there interest in a large three way "monkey coffin" collaboration?

    Originally posted by NyxOne View Post
    1. That's why boombox exists
    2. Anything with a 12" or 15" is not meant for portability unless it's a PA specifically designed for portability (neodymium driver, plastic enclosure).
    I said lug around because that is what tends to happen to second speakers. If these speakers are intended to be the main ones in the lounge why the emphasis on cheap drivers?

    Originally posted by NyxOne View Post
    I've a pair of Celestion Ditton 66 Monitor which are big floor stander. They look great! Don't you think ?
    But these are big speakers that do bass and not big monitors that do loud.

    I have a growing suspicion that people below a certain age that did not grow up lusting after big monitors they could not afford may not see things in quite the same way.

    Leave a comment:


  • NyxOne
    replied
    Re: Is there interest in a large three way "monkey coffin" collaboration?

    Originally posted by andy19191 View Post
    That is not the shape of a monitor. A monitor would be shorter with a height of 30" or so as illustrated in the pictures above. The specified driver doesn't need 100 litres. 70-80 litres will lose a few Hz at the bottom end in exchange for a more manageable cabinet for lugging around.
    1. That's why boombox exists
    2. Anything with a 12" or 15" is not meant for portability unless it's a PA specifically designed for portability (neodymium driver, plastic enclosure).

    Originally posted by andy19191;
    You are putting together the design but I would be surprised if the consensus was for a large floor standing tower speaker. A speaker with the pluses and minuses of a big old monitor that doesn't look like a big old monitor I would expect to have less appeal. I would also expect this to be more of a second speaker rather than the main speaker in the lounge. Again it is your vision and not mine but if I had huge floor standing speakers in the lounge I would expect thunderous bass which was, of course, part of your original vision.
    I've a pair of Celestion Ditton 66 Monitor which are big floor stander. They look great! Don't you think ?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	8033652133_e3d5567bbc_b.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	354.0 KB
ID:	1158910

    Originally posted by filmslayer View Post
    been following from the start , there's no replacement for displacement ... bigger is better !
    +1

    Chuck

    Leave a comment:


  • filmslayer
    replied
    Re: Is there interest in a large three way "monkey coffin" collaboration?

    been following from the start , there's no replacement for displacement ... bigger is better !

    Leave a comment:


  • djg
    replied
    Re: Is there interest in a large three way "monkey coffin" collaboration?

    I think a poll might be in order. Thread lurkers might be flushed out and a better idea of the interest in this speaker might result.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X